Die afskrif wys die foutiewe heffing.

Because there are two separate noun phrases, and both are definite:

• die afskrif = the copy
• die foutiewe heffing = the incorrect charge/levy

In Afrikaans, die is the definite article for all genders and for both singular and plural in most everyday use. So unlike English, where learners may expect different forms in some languages, Afrikaans just keeps using die.

No. Afrikaans does not have grammatical gender the way Dutch or German does.
So die stays the same regardless of whether the noun refers to something masculine, feminine, or neuter.

That makes Afrikaans simpler here:

• die afskrif
• die heffing
• die boek
• die vrou
• die kinders

They all use die as the definite article.

This is because the adjective comes before the noun.

In Afrikaans, adjectives usually take an -e ending when they are used attributively, meaning directly before a noun:

• foutief = faulty / incorrect
• die foutiewe heffing = the faulty/incorrect charge

Compare:

• Die heffing is foutief. = The charge is incorrect.
  Here the adjective comes after is, so it usually stays foutief.
• die foutiewe heffing = the incorrect charge
  Here it comes before the noun, so it becomes foutiewe.

So the -e is a very normal adjective ending in this position.

Afskrif usually means copy, duplicate, or sometimes transcript, depending on context.

So Die afskrif wys ... means that the copy/document/transcript shows ...

In administrative or legal contexts, afskrif often refers to:

• a copy of a document
• an official transcript
• a reproduced record

The exact English word depends on the situation, but copy is the safest basic meaning.

Heffing often means charge, levy, tax, assessment, or fee, depending on context.

So die foutiewe heffing could mean things like:

• the incorrect charge
• the erroneous levy
• the wrong fee
• the faulty assessment

If this sentence comes from a billing, tax, or official document context, charge or levy is often the best fit.

Yes. This sentence uses the standard subject–verb–object pattern:

• Die afskrif = subject
• wys = verb
• die foutiewe heffing = object

So literally:

• The copy
  • shows
    • the incorrect charge

This is very similar to normal English word order, which makes the sentence fairly straightforward for English speakers.

Usually no. Afrikaans verbs are much simpler than English verbs in the present tense.

wys stays the same with different subjects:

• Ek wys = I show
• Jy wys = you show
• Hy wys = he shows
• Ons wys = we show
• Hulle wys = they show

So unlike English, Afrikaans does not add a special -s only for he/she/it in the present tense. The verb form generally stays the same.

Yes. Foutiewe is flexible and often depends on context.

Possible translations include:

• incorrect
• wrong
• erroneous
• faulty

For a billing or tax context, incorrect or erroneous often sounds most natural in English:

• die foutiewe heffing = the incorrect charge
• die foutiewe heffing = the erroneous levy

So if the meaning you were shown uses a different English word, that is probably just a context choice, not a contradiction.

A rough English-friendly guide would be:

• Die ≈ dee
• afskrif ≈ AHF-skrif
• wys ≈ sounds a bit like vace or vice, depending on accent, but with the Afrikaans w
• die ≈ dee
• foutiewe ≈ FOW-tee-vuh
• heffing ≈ HEF-ing

A few helpful sound notes:

• Afrikaans w sounds more like English v than English w
• y in wys is not the same as English y
• g is not present here, so this sentence is easier than many Afrikaans ones

A more Afrikaans-like rhythm would be something like:

dee AHF-skrif vace dee FOW-tee-vuh HEF-ing

Yes, often you can.

Both wys and toon can mean show.

Very roughly:

• wys = show, point out, indicate
• toon = show, display, demonstrate

In many contexts, both work:

• Die afskrif wys die foutiewe heffing
• Die afskrif toon die foutiewe heffing

That said, wys is very common and natural in everyday Afrikaans.

In normal Afrikaans, descriptive adjectives usually come before the noun, just like in English:

• die foutiewe heffing = the incorrect charge

If you put the adjective after the noun, you usually need a verb:

• Die heffing is foutief. = The charge is incorrect.

So:

• before the noun: foutiewe heffing
• after the noun: usually only with is or another linking structure

Afrikaans does not normally use a direct noun + adjective pattern the way some other languages do.

Yes. It is a complete, grammatical sentence.

It has everything it needs:

• a subject: Die afskrif
• a verb: wys
• an object: die foutiewe heffing

It sounds like something you might see in an administrative, legal, banking, or tax-related context. On its own, it is perfectly natural, though in real life it would often appear near other information explaining what charge is being referred to.