Because noudat introduces a subordinate clause, and in Afrikaans subordinate clauses the finite verb usually goes to the end.
Here the tense is the perfect:
So instead of an English-like order, Afrikaans puts the verb material at the end of the subordinate clause:
That final het is completely normal.
The verb is aanpas, meaning to adapt / adjust.
Its past participle is aangepas. With many verbs that have a separable prefix, Afrikaans inserts ge- between the prefix and the main part of the verb:
So:
This is because Afrikaans main clauses follow a verb-second pattern.
The whole first clause:
comes first. That occupies the first slot of the sentence. So in the main clause, the finite verb must come next:
Literally, the structure is:
If the sentence started directly with the main clause, then you would get:
Both are correct, but the fronted subordinate clause causes the inversion.
Because gereed is being used as a predicate adjective after is.
In other words, it describes the state of dit:
After linking verbs like is, Afrikaans adjectives normally stay in their basic form.
Yes. Afrikaans very often writes compound nouns as one word.
So:
Together:
Because the sentence begins with a subordinate clause, and that clause is separated from the main clause with a comma.
So the structure is:
The comma helps mark the boundary between:
This is normal Afrikaans punctuation.