La sorcière n'espère plus que tu veuilles invoquer la bête avec ce sortilège.

Questions & Answers about La sorcière n'espère plus que tu veuilles invoquer la bête avec ce sortilège.

Why is veuilles in the subjunctive here instead of the indicative?
The verb espérer (to hope) is a special case in French. When used in an affirmative statement, it takes the indicative. But when it is negative, as in n'espère plus (no longer hopes), it expresses doubt or a lack of expectation. This uncertainty triggers the subjunctive mood, which is why we use veuilles instead of the indicative veux.
How would the verb change if the witch did hope you wanted to summon the beast?
If the sentence were affirmative (La sorcière espère que...), the doubt is removed, and espérer requires the indicative mood. The sentence would become: La sorcière espère que tu veux invoquer la bête...
Does the negative expression ne ... plus work the exact same way as ne ... pas here?
Yes! Any negative form of espérer que introduces enough doubt to require the subjunctive in the following clause. It doesn't matter if you use ne ... pas (doesn't hope), ne ... plus (no longer hopes), or ne ... jamais (never hopes)—they all trigger the subjunctive.
I often forget the subjunctive of vouloir. Is veuilles a regular formation?
No, vouloir is irregular in the subjunctive. For je, tu, il/elle/on, and ils/elles, it uses the special stem veill- to give us forms like que tu veuilles. However, for nous and vous, it reverts to a stem that looks like the imperfect indicative: que nous voulions and que vous vouliez.

Learn La sorcière n'espère plus que tu veuilles invoquer la bête avec ce sortilège and more in French

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free