Breakdown of Veljeskunta vaatii uskollisuutta, jotta emme sano ketään petturiksi.
ei
no / not (negative verb)
sanoa
to say
kukaan
anyone, nobody (with negation)
vaatia
to claim (demand)
jotta
so that / in order to
petturi
the traitor
veljeskunta
the brotherhood
uskollisuus
the loyalty
Questions & Answers about Veljeskunta vaatii uskollisuutta, jotta emme sano ketään petturiksi.
Why is petturiksi in the translative case here instead of the nominative or partitive?
In this sentence, the verb sanoa is used to mean "to call" rather than "to say". When labeling or calling someone something, sanoa requires the label to be in the translative case, which is marked by the -ksi ending.
Ketään is the object of emme sano. Is it in the partitive case just because the sentence is negative?
The negative verb does require it here, but importantly, it would be partitive even if the sentence were affirmative. When sanoa means "to call someone something", the object (the person being labeled) must always be in the partitive case.
Why does vaatia take the partitive object uskollisuutta?
Vaatia (to demand) takes a partitive object when you are demanding an abstract, uncountable concept like loyalty (uskollisuus). If the brotherhood demanded a specific, complete physical object, it would take the accusative (genitive) case instead.
What is the difference between using jotta and että in this context?
Jotta translates to "so that" or "in order that", explicitly stating the purpose of the brotherhood's demand. If you used että ("that"), the sentence would lose that clear sense of cause and effect, even though it would technically still be grammatically correct.
Learn Veljeskunta vaatii uskollisuutta, jotta emme sano ketään petturiksi and more in Finnish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free