Breakdown of Hoewel de planner zich misrekende, mocht er niets mislopen.
mogen
to be allowed to / may
er
there (existential)
niets
nothing
hoewel
although
Questions & Answers about Hoewel de planner zich misrekende, mocht er niets mislopen.
Both misrekende and mislopen use the prefix mis-. Are these verbs separable or inseparable?
The prefix mis- can be either, and the rule depends on word stress. In zich misrekenen (to miscalculate), the stress falls on the stem (-re-), making the prefix unstressed and the verb inseparable (past participle: misrekend). In mislopen (to go wrong), the stress falls on mis-, making it a separable verb. In a present-tense main clause, it splits: Het loopt mis (It goes wrong).
Why is the reflexive pronoun zich used with misrekende?
In Dutch, zich misrekenen is an inherently reflexive verb, whereas the English equivalent "to miscalculate" is not. You are literally saying the planner "miscalculated himself." Because the subject (de planner) is third-person singular, the matching reflexive pronoun is zich.
Why does the second half of the sentence begin with the verb mocht?
This is a classic application of the V2 (verb-second) rule. The sentence starts with a subordinate clause introduced by Hoewel (Although). That entire subordinate clause occupies the first position of the sentence. To keep the main verb in the second position, mocht must immediately follow the comma.
What is the function of er in mocht er niets mislopen?