De dief in de cel was agressief, en de handlanger was het ook.

Questions & Answers about De dief in de cel was agressief, en de handlanger was het ook.

Why do we need the word het in the second half of the sentence?
In English, you can end a sentence with a hanging verb like 'was too', but Dutch requires you to fill that gap. The word het acts as a placeholder pronoun that points back to the adjective agressief. You are literally saying 'the accomplice was it too'.
Can I just leave out het and say en de handlanger was ook?
No, that is a direct translation from English that sounds very unnatural in Dutch. You must use the resumptive pronoun het to replace the missing adjective so the verb was has a complement.
Does the word handlanger always imply something criminal?
Yes, a handlanger translates to an accomplice or henchman and carries a strongly negative or criminal connotation. If you want to refer to a partner in a positive or neutral setting, you would use a word like partner, medewerker, or collega.
Could I change the word order to was ook het?
No, in Dutch, specific unstressed pronouns like het usually stick directly to the finite verb. Because of this rule, the adverb ook must come after het, making was het ook the only correct order here.

Learn De dief in de cel was agressief, en de handlanger was het ook and more in Dutch

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free