Breakdown of Was deze man de dader van de overval?
zijn
to be
de man
the man
deze
this / these
van
from (possession, starting point) / made of
de dader
the perpetrator
de overval
the robbery
Questions & Answers about Was deze man de dader van de overval?
How would I answer this question using the resumptive het from this lesson?
You could say: Ja, hij was het (Yes, he was). Here, het replaces the entire noun phrase de dader van de overval. While in English you can just end the sentence with 'Yes, he was,' Dutch requires a pronoun like het to complete the verb zijn (to be).
Could I also answer this with a demonstrative pronoun, like Ja, dat was hij?
Yes, absolutely! Ja, dat was hij is a very natural response. In this case, dat points back to the concept of being the perpetrator. The important takeaway is that you cannot simply say Ja, hij was; you always need a pronoun like het or dat to fill the gap.
How does an overval differ from other crime vocabulary like diefstal and inbraak?
An overval specifically refers to a robbery or hold-up, usually involving confrontation or violence against people (like a bank robbery). Diefstal is the general term for theft, and inbraak means burglary (breaking into a building).
If the robbery was already mentioned in a previous sentence, could I use er to say 'the perpetrator of it'?
Yes, you would use ervan. When combining the preposition van with a reference to a thing (the robbery), they merge into the pronominal adverb ervan. You would then ask: Was deze man de dader ervan?
Learn Was deze man de dader van de overval and more in Dutch
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free