Breakdown of Hij zou bij de basis zijn ontvoerd.
zijn
to be
hij
he / it (referring to a 'de'-word)
bij
at / near / by
zullen
shall / will
Questions & Answers about Hij zou bij de basis zijn ontvoerd.
Why is zou translated as 'was supposedly' instead of 'would'?
In Dutch, zouden isn't just used for conditionals ('would'). As you are learning in this lesson, it is widely used in news and reporting to indicate hearsay, allegations, or unconfirmed information. Here, hij zou ... zijn ontvoerd means 'he is alleged to have been abducted' or 'he was supposedly abducted.'
Why does the sentence use zijn ontvoerd instead of hebben ontvoerd?
This is a passive sentence. To form the perfect passive ('has been abducted' or 'was abducted'), Dutch uses the auxiliary verb zijn plus the past participle (ontvoerd). If you used hebben (hij zou ... hebben ontvoerd), it would be an active sentence meaning 'he supposedly abducted (someone else)'.
Could the verbs at the end be written as ontvoerd zijn instead of zijn ontvoerd?
Yes. In a verbal cluster at the end of a clause, the auxiliary verb (zijn) and the past participle (ontvoerd) can be placed in either order. Both zijn ontvoerd and ontvoerd zijn are completely correct, though placing the auxiliary first is very common in written Dutch.
Why is bij translated as 'near' rather than 'at'?