Impersonal and Subjectless Sentences | Ukrainian Grammar

Ukrainian has an entire grammar of subjectless sentences — the безособо́ве ре́чення. These are sentences with no nominative subject at all: no doer, and crucially no dummy placeholder. Where English is obliged to insert a hollow "it" (it's getting dark), a vague "they/people" (they say), or a generic "one/you" (one must go), Ukrainian simply leaves the subject slot empty. This page approaches the construction from the syntactic angle: what fills the slots when there's no subject, and where the logical argument — if there is one — shows up (spoiler: usually the dative, sometimes the accusative). For the verb-by-verb lexical inventory, see impersonal verb constructions; here we focus on the sentence shapes.

💡

The structural signature of an impersonal sentence: no nominative anywhere, and a verb frozen in the 3rd-person singular neuter (Темні́є, Зро́блено) or 3rd-person plural (Ка́жуть). If a person is involved, they are not the subject — they surface in the dative (Мені́ хо́лодно) or sometimes the accusative (Мене́ ну́дить).

Type 1: predicative-adverb impersonals with a dative experiencer

The most important pattern for a learner. To say how someone feels, Ukrainian uses dative person + an invariant predicative word (which looks like an adverb and never agrees with anybody, because there's no subject to agree with). The person is the dative experiencer, not a subject.

Мені́ хо́лодно, мо́жна зачини́ти вікно́?

I'm cold, may I close the window? (Мені́ = dative experiencer; хо́лодно = invariant predicate; no subject at all.)

Йому́ ве́село на ве́чірці, не хо́че йти додо́му.

He's having fun at the party, he doesn't want to go home. (Йому́ = dative; ве́село = impersonal predicate.)

Ді́тям ну́дно сиді́ти вдо́ма ці́лий день.

The kids are bored sitting at home all day. (Ді́тям = dative experiencer; ну́дно = subjectless predicate.)

The dative experiencer is so central it gets a dedicated treatment under uses of the dative. Occasionally the experiencer is accusative instead — for bodily sensations expressed as something happening to you: Мене́ ну́дить "I feel sick" (literally "[it] sickens me").

To express necessity, possibility, and permission, Ukrainian uses a predicative word + infinitive, with no subject. If a person is named, again dative. These are the backbone of Ukrainian modality (see the modality overview).

Мені́ тре́ба бі́гти, бо запі́знююся на по́тяг.

I have to run, I'm late for the train. (тре́ба + infinitive; experiencer Мені́ in the dative, no subject.)

Тут не мо́жна паркува́тися — ви́пишуть штраф.

You can't park here — they'll fine you. (не мо́жна = impersonal prohibition; English needs a fake 'you'; ви́пишуть is itself an agentless 3rd plural.)

Мо́жна вві́йти?

May I come in? (Мо́жна = impersonal request for permission; subjectless.)

Type 3: weather and nature

Natural phenomena just happen, with no agent. The verb stands completely alone — no subject, no dummy "it."

Уже́ вечорі́є, а ми ще в доро́зі.

It's already getting dark, and we're still on the road. (вечорі́є = subjectless weather verb; no 'it'.)

За ніч си́льно похолода́ло, надво́рі мину́с де́сять.

It got much colder overnight; it's minus ten outside. (похолода́ло = impersonal, neuter singular, no subject anywhere.)

Світа́є пі́зно, бо вже о́сінь.

It gets light late, because it's autumn now. (Світа́є — the verb carries the whole meaning by itself.)

Type 4: the -но / -то passive

The agentless completed-action passive — Зро́блено, Напи́сано, Ви́конано — is impersonal by structure: an invariant predicate in -но/-то, no subject, and the logical object in the accusative. It reports what got done without naming a doer. (Big enough to have its own page.)

Робо́ту ви́конано в строк, мо́жна здава́ти.

The work has been completed on time, it can be handed in. (ви́конано = impersonal -но; робо́ту is the accusative object, NOT a subject.)

На две́рях напи́сано: «Сторо́ннім вхід заборо́нено».

On the door it says: 'No entry for unauthorized persons'. (напи́сано, заборо́нено = impersonal -но forms, subjectless.)

Type 5: the agentless 3rd-person plural ("they/people")

To report what "people" say or do without naming anyone, Ukrainian uses a bare 3rd-person-plural verb with no pronoun — no вони́. The missing pronoun is the whole point: leaving it out keeps the agent generic.

Ка́жуть, що взи́мку тут ду́же га́рно.

They say it's very beautiful here in winter. (Ка́жуть = bare 3rd plural, no 'they' — 'people say'.)

По ра́діо передава́ли, що за́втра бу́де дощ.

It was announced on the radio that it'll rain tomorrow. (передава́ли = agentless 3rd plural; English needs 'they' or a passive.)

У две́рі сту́кають — піди́ відчини́.

There's someone knocking at the door — go and open it. (сту́кають = agentless 3rd plural; the knocker is left unidentified.)

Type 6: the infinitive sentence

A distinctively Slavic shape: a sentence whose entire predicate is a bare infinitive, with the person (if any) in the dative. It expresses deliberation, obligation, inevitability, or — when negated — impossibility. English has no neat parallel; it reaches for "what to do?", "what am I to…?", or "there's no way you'll…".

Що роби́ти? Гро́шей нема́, а ремо́нт тре́ба заве́ршити.

What's to be done? There's no money, but the renovation has to be finished. (Що роби́ти? = a bare-infinitive deliberation, no subject.)

Тобі́ туди́ не пройти́ — там охоро́на.

You won't get through there — there's security. (не пройти́ = negated infinitive of impossibility; Тобі́ = dative; no subject.)

Як мені́ тепе́р йому́ це поясни́ти?

How am I supposed to explain this to him now? (мені́ = dative experiencer of the infinitive поясни́ти; subjectless deliberation.)

Type 7: existence and absence (нема́є + genitive)

Negative existence is impersonal: нема́є / нема́ + the genitive, with no subject. (The genitive is the genitive of negation and absence.)

Ча́су нема́є зо́всім, усе́ гори́ть.

There's no time at all, everything's on fire. (нема́є + genitive ча́су; subjectless — and note ча́су is genitive, not a nominative subject.)

У хо́лодильнику нічо́го нема́є — тре́ба в магази́н.

There's nothing in the fridge — we need to go to the shop. (нічо́го нема́є + тре́ба, two impersonals in a row.)

Where the logical argument goes: the syntactic heart of it

Pull back and the unifying picture is clear. An impersonal sentence has no nominative. But meaning still needs an experiencer or a logical object — and Ukrainian routes them to oblique cases:

Dative for the experiencer of a state, a modal, or an infinitive: Мені́ хо́лодно, Мені́ тре́ба, Тобі́ не пройти́.
Accusative for the logical object of a -но/-то passive, or a bodily sensation: Робо́ту ви́конано, Мене́ ну́дить.
Genitive for the thing whose absence is asserted: Ча́су нема́є.

The nominative slot stays empty, and the verb sits frozen — 3rd-person singular neuter (Темні́є, Зро́блено) or 3rd-person plural (Ка́жуть). That frozen verb and that empty subject slot are the diagnostic of the whole construction.

Source-language comparison

For an English speaker, the rule of thumb is brutal but reliable: wherever English supplies a dummy subject, Ukrainian deletes it. "It's getting dark" → Темні́є. "They say…" → Ка́жуть…. "One must go" → Тре́ба йти. "I'm cold" → Мені́ хо́лодно (dative, not "I am"). "What's to be done?" → Що роби́ти?. "There's no time" → Ча́су нема́є. The English instinct to find or invent a subject must be switched off — and the logical subject, if there is one, comes back as a dative (or sometimes accusative).

For a Russian speaker, the whole inventory is familiar (Темнеет, Говорят, Надо идти, Мне холодно, Что делать?, Времени нет), so the transfer is excellent; the work is lexical — тре́ба (not надо), нема́є / нема́ + genitive, мо́жна / не мо́жна, and the Ukrainian -но/-то impersonal, which is more prominent and productive than its Russian counterpart.

Common Mistakes

❌ Я хо́лодно. (using a nominative pronoun for 'I'm cold')

No subject is allowed here — the experiencer is dative: Мені́ хо́лодно.

✅ Мені́ хо́лодно.

I'm cold — dative experiencer Мені́ + impersonal predicate.

❌ Воно́ темні́є надво́рі. (inserting a dummy subject 'воно́')

Ukrainian has no weather 'it'; the verb stands alone: Надво́рі темні́є.

✅ Надво́рі темні́є.

It's getting dark outside — subjectless weather verb.

❌ Я тре́ба йти. (nominative subject with тре́ба)

тре́ба is impersonal; the experiencer is dative: Мені́ тре́ба йти.

✅ Мені́ тре́ба йти.

I have to go — dative Мені́ + impersonal тре́ба.

❌ Робо́та ви́конано. (nominative object with the -но passive)

The -но/-то passive takes the ACCUSATIVE object, never a nominative: Робо́ту ви́конано.

✅ Робо́ту ви́конано.

The work has been completed — accusative робо́ту, no subject.

❌ Час нема́є. (nominative after нема́є)

нема́є governs the GENITIVE: Ча́су нема́є.

✅ Ча́су нема́є.

There's no time — нема́є + genitive ча́су.

Key Takeaways

An impersonal sentence has no nominative subject — and no dummy "it/they/you/one"; the verb is frozen in the 3rd-sg neuter or 3rd plural.
States use a dative experiencer (Мені́ хо́лодно, Йому́ ве́село); modals too (Мені́ тре́ба йти, Не мо́жна).
Weather stands alone (Темні́є, Похолода́ло); the -но/-то passive takes an accusative object (Робо́ту ви́конано).
The agentless 3rd plural drops the pronoun (Ка́жуть, передава́ли); the infinitive sentence uses a bare infinitive + dative (Що роби́ти?, Тобі́ не пройти́); нема́є + genitive for absence (Ча́су нема́є).
The logical argument surfaces in an oblique case — dative, accusative, or genitive — never the nominative.

Now practice Ukrainian

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Ukrainian→