If you learn one construction that instantly makes your Ukrainian sound native, it is this one. The -но / -то impersonal (безособо́ва фо́рма на -но/-то) is the natural, idiomatic Ukrainian passive — the everyday way to say "it has been done / written / built" with no subject and no named agent. It is built from the passive-participle stem but ends in an invariable -но (or -то), and it is everywhere: on signs (Вхід заборо́нено "Entry forbidden"), in the news (Уго́ду підпи́сано "The agreement has been signed"), and in formal prose. Russian conspicuously lacks this construction, which is exactly why over-translating from Russian produces stiff, un-Ukrainian sentences. This page teaches the form, its iron rule about the accusative object, and why it is the default Ukrainian passive.
What it is: a subjectless statement that something got done
Take the participle (covered on passive past participles) and chop its adjective ending, replacing it with -о:
- прочи́тан-ий → прочи́тано "(it has been) read"
- напи́сан-ий → напи́сано "(it has been) written"
- зро́блен-ий → зро́блено "(it has been) done"
- відкри́т-ий → відкри́то "(it has been) opened"
The result is not an adjective and not a finite verb — it is an invariable predicative that says, impersonally, "such-and-such has been done." There is no subject: nobody is named, nothing stands in the nominative. The thing the action was done to appears as the logical object in the accusative.
Робо́ту ви́конано в строк.
The work has been completed on time. (ви́конано — invariant; робо́ту is accusative, there is no subject.)
Лист напи́сано, ма́рку наклеє́но — мо́жна відправля́ти.
The letter is written, the stamp is stuck on — we can send it. (напи́сано, наклеє́но — both invariant -но forms.)
The forms: -но and -то
The split mirrors the participle: verbs that make a -ний/-ений participle make a -но impersonal; verbs that make a -тий participle make a -то impersonal.
| Verb | Participle | -но / -то form | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| прочита́ти | прочи́таний | прочи́тано | has been read |
| написа́ти | напи́саний | напи́сано | has been written |
| зроби́ти | зро́блений | зро́блено | has been done |
| збудува́ти | збудо́ваний | збудо́вано | has been built |
| ви́конати | ви́конаний | ви́конано | has been carried out |
| заборони́ти | заборо́нений | заборо́нено | is forbidden |
| відкри́ти | відкри́тий | відкри́то | has been opened |
| закри́ти | закри́тий | закри́то | has been closed |
| забу́ти | забу́тий | забу́то | has been forgotten |
Цей міст збудо́вано ще за́ Австро-Уго́рщини.
This bridge was built back in Austro-Hungarian times. (збудо́вано — the idiomatic Ukrainian passive where English uses 'was built'.)
Усі́ докуме́нти переві́рено й заві́рено нотарі́усом.
All the documents have been checked and certified by a notary. (переві́рено, заві́рено — two -но forms in a row; нотарі́усом names the agent in the instrumental, which is allowed but optional.)
The iron rule: the object stays in the ACCUSATIVE
This is the single most important fact, and the one Russian speakers get wrong. Because there is no subject, the thing acted upon does not rise to the nominative — it keeps the accusative it would have had as the object of the active verb:
- Active: Хтось прочита́в кни́гу (accusative кни́гу).
- Impersonal: Кни́гу прочи́тано — кни́гу stays accusative.
Compare the wrong, Russian-style instinct of promoting the object to a nominative subject:
Кни́гу прочи́тано за оди́н ве́чір.
The book was read in one evening. (Кни́гу — ACCUSATIVE; this is the correct Ukrainian.)
Робо́ту зро́блено, две́рі зачи́нено, сві́тло ви́мкнено.
The work is done, the door is closed, the light is switched off. (Робо́ту, две́рі, сві́тло — all accusative objects of invariant -но forms.)
For feminine and most masculine nouns the accusative is visibly different from the nominative (кни́га → кни́гу, робо́та → робо́ту), so the rule is easy to see. With neuter nouns and inanimate masculines whose accusative equals the nominative (сло́во, лист), the form looks the same — but it is still functioning as an accusative object, not a subject. This is why the verb never agrees with it: there is nothing to agree with.
Tense: present-by-default, було́ for the past-perfect
On its own, the -но/-то form reads as a present-relevant completed result — "(it) has been done," true as of now. To push the completion further into the past — "(it) had been done" before some other past moment — add the neuter auxiliary було́:
Коли́ ми прийшли́, усе́ вже було́ ви́рішено без нас.
When we arrived, everything had already been decided without us. (було́ ви́рішено — past-perfect nuance: done before we came.)
Уго́ду було́ підпи́сано ще торі́к, але́ оприлю́днено лише́ тепе́р.
The agreement had been signed back last year, but was only made public now. (було́ підпи́сано vs plain оприлю́днено.)
There is no auxiliary in the present — you do not say *є зро́блено. The bare form carries the present meaning by itself. A future-oriented "will be done" is normally expressed differently (with a finite future or a different passive), not by adding бу́де to -но.
Where you actually meet it: signs, news, officialese
This construction lives in the public sphere. Once you start looking, it is on every door, ticket, and headline.
Вхід заборо́нено. Стороннім вхід заборо́нено.
Entry forbidden. No entry for unauthorized persons. (заборо́нено — the standard wording on signs everywhere in Ukraine.)
На две́рях напи́сано: «Зачи́нено на переоблі́к».
On the door it says: 'Closed for stocktaking'. (напи́сано and зачи́нено — both -но, the everyday phrasing for such notices.)
Поже́жу ліквідо́вано, поте́рпілих доста́влено до ліка́рні.
The fire has been extinguished, the injured have been taken to hospital. (ліквідо́вано, доста́влено — newsroom -но style.)
Зако́н ухва́лено в дру́гому чита́нні бі́льшістю голосі́в.
The law was passed in the second reading by a majority of votes. (ухва́лено — the standard parliamentary report form.)
The reason it dominates here is precisely its agentlessness: a sign or a news report states that something was done without needing — or wanting — to name who did it. That is exactly the job English does with the passive ("Entry is forbidden," "The law was passed"), and Ukrainian does it with -но/-то.
Source-language comparison
For an English speaker, the closest match is the agentless passive: "Entry is forbidden," "The work has been completed," "The bridge was built in 1750." The mental adjustment is that Ukrainian keeps the logical object in the accusative (Робо́ту ви́конано) rather than promoting it to a subject the way English does ("The work was completed"). Think of -но/-то as a tidy, subject-free "it's-been-done" slot — and remember it is invariant, so it never changes for gender or number.
For a Russian speaker, this is the headline difference of the whole topic. Russian has essentially no productive -но/-то impersonal; it expresses the agentless passive with an agreeing short participle (работа сделана) where the object becomes a nominative subject. Ukrainian does the opposite: Робо́ту зро́блено, object in the accusative, verb invariant. The two errors to unlearn are (1) promoting the object to the nominative and (2) making the predicate agree. Keep the object accusative; freeze the verb.
Common Mistakes
❌ Кни́га прочи́тано. (object promoted to nominative)
Incorrect — the object stays accusative: Кни́гу прочи́тано.
✅ Кни́гу прочи́тано.
The book has been read — object кни́гу in the accusative.
❌ Листи́ напи́сані. (when you mean the ACTION 'the letters have been written')
Not for the action — that is the agreeing participle (a state). For the agentless action use the invariant -но form: Листи́ напи́сано.
✅ Листи́ напи́сано.
The letters have been written — invariant -но, object листи́ in the accusative.
❌ Робо́ту зро́блена. (making the -но form agree)
Incorrect — the impersonal predicate never agrees: Робо́ту зро́блено.
✅ Робо́ту зро́блено.
The work has been done — invariant зро́блено.
❌ Усе́ є зро́блено. (adding a present auxiliary)
Incorrect — there is no present auxiliary; the bare form means 'has been done': Усе́ зро́блено.
✅ Усе́ зро́блено.
Everything has been done — bare -но carries the present meaning.
❌ Цей буди́нок збудо́вано краси́вий. (treating -но as an agreeing adjective)
Mixed — the building's beauty needs an adjective, not the impersonal: Цей буди́нок збудо́вано краси́во OR Це краси́во збудо́ваний буди́нок.
✅ Це краси́во збудо́ваний буди́нок.
This is a beautifully built house — the agreeing participle for description.
Key Takeaways
- The -но/-то impersonal (зро́блено, напи́сано, відкри́то, заборо́нено) is the natural, idiomatic Ukrainian passive — agentless, subjectless, invariant.
- Built from the participle stem: -ний → -но (прочи́тано), -тий → -то (відкри́то, забу́то).
- The logical object stays in the ACCUSATIVE (Кни́гу прочи́тано, Робо́ту ви́конано) — never promoted to a nominative subject.
- It never agrees — same form for masculine, feminine, neuter, plural objects. If it agrees, you have switched to the participle (Кни́га прочи́тана), which is a different (state) construction.
- Present meaning by default; add було́ for a past-perfect nuance (було́ ви́конано). No present auxiliary (*є зро́блено).
- It is everywhere — signs (Вхід заборо́нено), news (Зако́н ухва́лено), officialese — and the top marker of authentic Ukrainian that Russian lacks.
Now practice Ukrainian
Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.
Start learning Ukrainian→Related Topics
- Participles and Verbal Adverbs: OverviewB1 — A map of Ukrainian's non-finite verb forms — and a stylistic warning: Ukrainian uses them LESS than Russian, preferring relative clauses (який…). The forms: passive participles (-ний/-тий: напи́саний, відкри́тий), the discouraged active participles (-чий/-лий), the verbal adverb (дієприслі́вник: -чи чита́ючи 'while reading', -вши прочита́вши 'having read'), and the idiomatic -но/-то impersonal predicate (напи́сано, зро́блено 'it has been done').
- Passive Past Participles (-ний / -тий)B1 — The passive past participle (паси́вний дієприкме́тник) — Ukrainian's main 'done/made/written' word. Formed from perfective transitive verbs in -ний/-ений (прочи́таний, напи́саний, зро́блений, побудо́ваний) or -тий (відкри́тий, забу́тий, розби́тий, ми́тий). It declines like an adjective and agrees in gender, number, and case (напи́саний лист, напи́сана запи́ска, напи́сані листи́), used attributively (зачи́нені две́рі) and predicatively (Две́рі зачи́нені). Crucially, Ukrainian reserves -ний for the resultant STATE and prefers the -но/-то impersonal (Две́рі зачи́нено) for the action itself.
- The Passive Voice in UkrainianB2 — Ukrainian has NO all-purpose 'be + past participle' passive. It expresses the passive by three native routes: (1) the invariant -но/-то impersonal for completed past actions (Кни́гу напи́сано, Мі́сто засно́вано) — the idiomatic default; (2) the -ся reflexive passive for ongoing imperfective processes (Буди́нок буду́ється, Хліб пече́ться); (3) бути + passive participle (Кни́га напи́сана / була́ напи́сана), which leans toward a resultant STATE and sounds bookish as a true passive. The named agent, when present, takes the INSTRUMENTAL (рома́н напи́саний письме́нником), never a 'by'-preposition. Above all, Ukrainian prefers ACTIVE recasting — translating an English passive usually means choosing a Ukrainian-native route, not calquing be+participle.
- Impersonal Verb ConstructionsB1 — Безособо́ві ре́чення — sentences with NO grammatical subject, which Ukrainian uses constantly. Six types: weather/nature (Світа́є, Похолода́ло, Сніжи́ть); states with a DATIVE experiencer (Мені́ хо́лодно, Йому́ пога́но, Хо́четься спа́ти); modal predicatives (Тре́ба йти, Мо́жна?, Не мо́жна, Слід поду́мати); the -но/-то passive (Зро́блено); existence/absence with нема́є + genitive (Гро́шей нема́є); and the agentless 3rd-plural 'they/people' (Ка́жуть, що...). The key insight: where English inserts a dummy 'it' or 'one/you', Ukrainian drops the subject entirely and makes the experiencer DATIVE — 'I'm cold' is Мені́ хо́лодно (literally 'to-me cold'), 'I feel like sleeping' is Мені́ хо́четься спа́ти.
- Impersonal and Subjectless SentencesB1 — The syntax of sentences with NO nominative subject — where English supplies a dummy 'it/they/you/one', Ukrainian drops the subject entirely and the logical argument (if any) surfaces as a dative or accusative: Темні́є, Ка́жуть, Тре́ба йти, Мені́ хо́лодно, Що роби́ти?
- Accusative: Uses Beyond the Direct ObjectB1 — The accusative does more than mark the object — with в/у, на, за, під, через it marks motion TOWARD a target (іду в школу), it expresses bare-preposition duration (чекав годину 'waited an hour'), and it stands in a pivotal contrast with the locative: the same prepositions в/у and на take the accusative for direction (куди? в школу) but the locative for static location (де? в школі).