Breakdown of Mağaranın sadece sarkıt ve dikitlerden ibaret olduğunu gördük.
ve
and
olmak
to be
görmek
to see
sadece
only, just
Questions & Answers about Mağaranın sadece sarkıt ve dikitlerden ibaret olduğunu gördük.
Why is it mağaranın (genitive) instead of just mağara?
This is because mağaranın is the subject of a subordinate noun clause (meaning "that the cave is..."). When a verb is turned into a noun using the -DIK suffix (like olduğunu here), the subject of that specific action takes the genitive case.
Can you break down the word olduğunu?
It comes from olmak (to be/become). We add the participle suffix -DIK (changing to -duğ) to represent "the fact that it is". Next, the 3rd person possessive -u is added to match mağaranın, and finally the buffer -n- and accusative -u are attached because this entire clause acts as the direct object of gördük (we saw).
The lesson is about "-DAn ibaret olmak". How does that structure fit into this sentence?
İbaret means "composed of" or "consisting of" and always links with the ablative suffix (-DAn) on the noun before it. Because ibaret is not a verb itself, it needs a helper like olmak to take verbal suffixes. Instead of a standalone sentence like mağara ibarettir (the cave is composed of), we are saying "...that it is composed of", so olmak takes the clause suffixes to become olduğunu.
The English translation says "stalactites and stalagmites", but only has the plural and ablative suffixes. Why doesn't have them?