Breakdown of Tüccarlar çanakları sikkelerle almış.
almak
to take, to buy
ile
with / by / and (linking nouns)
tüccar
merchant
sikke
coin
Questions & Answers about Tüccarlar çanakları sikkelerle almış.
The English translation includes 'apparently,' but I don't see a separate word for it here. Why is that?
The 'apparently' comes from the -mış suffix in almış (evidential past tense). It shows the speaker didn't see the purchase happen, but rather deduced it (perhaps from an archaeological discovery) or heard about it. Unlike almış olsa gerek (must have bought) which you are learning in this lesson for strong logical deduction, just using -mış is a slightly softer way to say 'I gather that' or 'apparently'.
Why is the accusative case used in çanakları instead of just saying çanaklar?
The -ı suffix makes it the definite object of the verb. It indicates that the merchants bought specific bowls that are already known in the context. If they had bought bowls in general, the sentence would just use the bare plural form çanaklar.
Can you break down the word sikkelerle?
It consists of sikke (coin) + -ler (plural) + -le (with). The -le suffix is the attached form of the word ile. Here, it acts as the instrumental case, showing the method of payment: 'with coins' or 'using coins'.
Are tüccar and sikke the normal words used for merchant and coin in everyday Turkish?