Breakdown of Om du hade vikit rätt, skulle vingen vara symmetrisk.
vara
to be
du
you (singular)
ha
to have
rätt
right
Questions & Answers about Om du hade vikit rätt, skulle vingen vara symmetrisk.
Why do we mix the past perfect hade vikit with the present conditional skulle vara?
This is a mixed conditional sentence. The condition happened in the past (the folding action is over), but the result affects the present (the wing would be symmetrical right now). If the result had also been in the past, you would use skulle ha varit (would have been).
Could we drop the word om to make this sound more advanced?
Yes! Just like in English ("Had you folded it correctly..."), Swedish allows you to drop om by starting the clause with the verb. You could say: Hade du vikit rätt, skulle vingen vara symmetrisk. This inverted conditional is very common in both written and spoken Swedish.
Why is the word order skulle vingen vara instead of vingen skulle vara?
This is a great place to remember the V2 (verb-second) rule. The entire om-clause (Om du hade vikit rätt) acts as the first block of information in the sentence. Because the verb must come second, the main clause immediately starts with the finite verb skulle, which pushes the subject vingen after it.
The supine form here is vikit. Isn't it also correct to say vikt?