Breakdown of Den där figuren skulle jag kasta, om vi hade klippt fel.
jag
I
vi
we
kasta
to throw
ha
to have
den där
that (en)
om
if, whether
klippa
to cut (with scissors)
skulle
would
fel
wrong
figuren
the figure (shape, character)
Questions & Answers about Den där figuren skulle jag kasta, om vi hade klippt fel.
Why is the main clause in the present conditional (skulle jag kasta) but the om clause in the past perfect (hade klippt)?
This sentence uses a mixed unreal conditional. It describes a hypothetical situation where a past action affects the present. The condition happened in the past (om vi hade klippt fel), but the result applies to the present or future (skulle jag kasta).
Why does the sentence use skulle jag kasta instead of the standard subject-verb order jag skulle kasta?
The sentence starts with the object Den där figuren to give it special emphasis. Because Swedish enforces the V2 rule in main clauses, the verb skulle must take the second position immediately after the fronted object, which pushes the subject jag into the third position.
Is fel functioning as an adverb here?
Yes. While ett fel is a noun meaning a mistake, fel is very frequently used as an adverb to mean incorrectly or wrong. It is placed directly after verbs to show an action was done wrong, such as klippt fel for cut incorrectly, kört fel for driven the wrong way, or sagt fel for misspoke.
Could we drop om and still keep the conditional meaning?
Yes, but you would need to move the conditional clause to the beginning of the sentence and invert the subject and verb. It would look like this: Hade vi klippt fel, skulle jag kasta den där figuren. This structure is extremely common in Swedish.
Learn Den där figuren skulle jag kasta, om vi hade klippt fel and more in Swedish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free