El chile es tan fuerte como para quemar el paladar.

Questions & Answers about El chile es tan fuerte como para quemar el paladar.

The translation says "strong enough to", but I don't see a word for "enough" here. Is this the standard way to say that?
Yes! While you could use a literal translation like lo suficientemente fuerte para, the structure tan + adjective + como para (literally "so strong as to") is a very natural and common way to express that a threshold has been reached. It means exactly "strong enough to".
Why do we use the infinitive quemar here instead of como para que with the subjunctive?
We use the infinitive because there is no change of subject. The chili pepper (el chile) is both the thing that is strong and the thing doing the burning. If the sentence introduced a new subject (like "strong enough for you to cry"), you would use como para que followed by the subjunctive: tan fuerte como para que llores.
Why does the Spanish sentence use el paladar (the palate) instead of tu paladar if the English translation says "your palate"?
In Spanish, it is a standard rule to use definite articles (el, la, los, las) rather than possessive adjectives (mi, tu, su) when talking about body parts. The English translation uses "your palate" to mean "a person's palate" in a general sense, but Spanish simply uses el paladar.
Is fuerte commonly used for spicy food, or should it be picante?
Picante is the direct word for "spicy", but fuerte (strong) is widely used to describe food or drink with an intense, overwhelming, or harsh flavor, which perfectly describes a chili that burns your mouth.

Learn El chile es tan fuerte como para quemar el paladar and more in Spanish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free