Aun cuando estemos sedientos, cruzaremos las dunas de arena.

Questions & Answers about Aun cuando estemos sedientos, cruzaremos las dunas de arena.

Why is estemos in the subjunctive instead of the indicative (estamos)?
When using aun cuando (even if / even when) to talk about a hypothetical or future situation, Spanish requires the subjunctive because the event isn't declared as a definite fact yet. If you used the indicative (aun cuando estamos sedientos), the meaning would change to "even though we are [currently, factually] thirsty."
Could I use incluso si instead of aun cuando here?
Yes, but you would have to change the verb to the indicative! Unlike aun cuando or aunque, the phrase incluso si (even if) generally takes the present indicative for hypothetical present or future events. So you would say incluso si estamos sedientos, cruzaremos...
I learned to use tener sed for "to be thirsty." Why use estar sediento?
Both are completely correct. While tener sed (literally "to have thirst") is the standard, everyday way to say you are thirsty, estar sediento uses the adjective sediento (thirsty). It sounds a bit more descriptive, intense, or dramatic, which perfectly fits the extreme imagery of crossing sand dunes.
Why doesn't aun have an accent mark (aún) in this sentence?
The word aun (without the tilde) means "even" (similar to incluso), which is exactly what we need for the phrase aun cuando (even when). You only add the accent mark (aún) when the word means "still" or "yet" as a synonym for todavía.

Learn Aun cuando estemos sedientos, cruzaremos las dunas de arena and more in Spanish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free