Questions & Answers about No comas la papilla porque es para el bebé.
Why is it comas instead of comes?
This is a negative command telling someone not to do something. For regular -er and -ir verbs like comer, the negative tú command changes the ending to -as. So while tú comes is the statement 'you eat', no comas is the command 'do not eat!'. This is often called the 'opposite vowel' rule because -er verbs take an 'a' ending.
Why do we use para instead of por for 'for the baby'?
Why does this sentence use es (from ser) instead of está (from estar)?
Does papilla just mean 'baby food'?