Breakdown of Niestety nie mógł przyjść, ale miał ważny powód.
mieć
to have
nie
no / not
ale
but
móc
to be able to
ważny
important
przyjść
to come, to arrive
niestety
unfortunately
powód
reason
Questions & Answers about Niestety nie mógł przyjść, ale miał ważny powód.
Why is it mógł with an ó, and would this change if a woman couldn't come?
The verb miał means "he had", coming from the dictionary form mieć. Why did the e change to an a?
How do we know the sentence means "he" couldn't come if the word on (he) is missing?
Why use przyjść (to come) instead of a basic walking verb like iść?
przyjść is a perfective verb that specifically focuses on the completed result of arriving at a destination. iść just focuses on the ongoing process of walking. Since the sentence is about him failing to complete the action of showing up, przyjść is the natural choice.
What case is ważny powód (important reason), and why doesn't it have a special ending?
It is in the accusative case because it is the direct object of miał (he had). However, powód is a masculine inanimate noun. In Polish, the accusative case for masculine inanimate nouns looks exactly the same as the basic dictionary form (nominative case). That is why the ending doesn't change here.
Learn Niestety nie mógł przyjść, ale miał ważny powód and more in Polish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free