Zło nie ma moralności i nie dba o nikogo.

Questions & Answers about Zło nie ma moralności i nie dba o nikogo.

If I wanted to add wszak to mean "After all, evil has no morality...", where would it naturally fit in this sentence?
You would typically put it at the very beginning or right after the subject. So you could say Wszak zło nie ma moralności... or Zło wszak nie ma moralności.... It acts as a rhetorical particle to set a "as we all know" tone for the whole statement.
The verb phrase is negative (nie dba). Why doesn't the case after the preposition o change to the genitive?
The "genitive of negation" rule only applies to direct objects. When a verb is followed by a preposition (like dbać o), the preposition stubbornly demands its usual case, regardless of whether the verb is negated. Here, the preposition o always takes the accusative when talking about caring for someone.
If o takes the accusative here, why is the word nikogo used? Isn't that the genitive form of nikt?
It is both! For animate pronouns like nikt (nobody) or kto (who), the accusative form is identical to the genitive form. So nikogo is grammatically in the accusative case here because it follows the preposition o, even though it looks exactly like the genitive.
In English, we say "does not care about anyone". Why do we use nikogo (nobody) instead of a word for "anyone"?
Polish strictly requires a double negative. Whenever you have a negated verb like nie dba, any indefinite pronouns associated with it must also be in their negative forms (like nikt, nigdy, or nic). A literal translation of the Polish structure is "does not care about nobody".

Learn Zło nie ma moralności i nie dba o nikogo and more in Polish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free