Question 1

Why do we use było after trzeba instead of another past tense form?

Accepted Answer

Trzeba (it is necessary) is an impersonal word, meaning there is no specific subject like he or we. When forming the past tense of impersonal predicates like trzeba, można, or warto, you always use the third-person singular neuter form of the verb być, which is było.

Question 2

The English translation says 'had been necessary', but the Polish uses the standard past tense trzeba było. Why doesn't Polish use a past perfect tense here?

Accepted Answer

Polish does historically have a past perfect tense, but it is almost never used in modern language. Instead, Polish uses the standard past tense (trzeba było) and relies on context or words like wcześniej (earlier) to show that the action happened further in the past.

Question 3

Why is ten antyk not in the genitive case here? Doesn't trzeba usually require the genitive?

Accepted Answer

That is a great catch! When trzeba is used directly with a noun to mean you need something, that noun takes the genitive case. However, in this sentence, trzeba było is followed by the infinitive verb sprzedać (to sell). The verb sprzedać takes a direct object in the accusative case. Since antyk is a masculine inanimate noun, its accusative form is identical to its nominative form, remaining ten antyk.

Question 4

Could I swap the word order and say było trzeba instead of trzeba było?

Accepted Answer

Yes, you can. Polish word order is flexible. While trzeba było is the most common and natural-sounding order, saying było trzeba is also grammatically correct and means exactly the same thing.

Kolekcjoner powiedział, że trzeba było sprzedać ten antyk wcześniej.

Breakdown of Kolekcjoner powiedział, że trzeba było sprzedać ten antyk wcześniej.

Questions & Answers about Kolekcjoner powiedział, że trzeba było sprzedać ten antyk wcześniej.

Learn Kolekcjoner powiedział, że trzeba było sprzedać ten antyk wcześniej and more in Polish