Question 1

Why do we use the subjunctive sia instead of the indicative è in the first clause?

Accepted Answer

The phrase supposto che (supposing that) is a conjunction of assumption. Because it sets up a hypothetical premise rather than stating a known fact, it triggers the use of the subjunctive mood (sia) in the dependent clause.

Question 2

The first verb (sia) is present subjunctive, but the second (perderà) is future. How does this tense pairing work?

Accepted Answer

This is a standard structure for hypotheses. The premise uses the present subjunctive (sia) because it is a current assumption. The consequence uses the future indicative (perderà) because losing the compensation is a factual event that will happen later if the premise turns out to be true.

Question 3

Could I use tutti instead of ognuno here?

Accepted Answer

Yes, but the verb would have to change. Ognuno means "each one" and acts as a singular subject, which is why it pairs with the singular perderà. If you used tutti (everybody/all), you would need the plural verb: tutti perderanno il risarcimento. In this context, ognuno emphasizes that every individual policyholder will lose their payout.

Question 4

Is risarcimento the standard word for a refund?

Accepted Answer

It is specifically used for "compensation" or "damages" (like an insurance payout for a fire), rather than a simple refund. If you want a refund for a canceled train ticket or a shirt that didn't fit, you would ask for a rimborso.

Supposto che l'incendio sia fraudolento, ognuno perderà il risarcimento.

Breakdown of Supposto che l'incendio sia fraudolento, ognuno perderà il risarcimento.

Questions & Answers about Supposto che l'incendio sia fraudolento, ognuno perderà il risarcimento.

Learn Supposto che l'incendio sia fraudolento, ognuno perderà il risarcimento and more in Italian