Pur condannato all'ergastolo, spera nella libertà.

Questions & Answers about Pur condannato all'ergastolo, spera nella libertà.

Why is pur followed just by a past participle (condannato) instead of a full verb?
When the subject of both halves of the sentence is the same, you can use pur + past participle (or gerund) as a shortcut for 'even though' or 'although'. It is a more elegant, concise way of saying anche se è stato condannato (even if he has been sentenced).
I learned that 'although' is sebbene or anche se. Could I use one of those here?
Yes! You could say anche se condannato or sebbene condannato, which are both grammatically correct and mean the same thing. Pur is very common in written Italian for these shortened phrases, but they are largely interchangeable here.
Why does the sentence use nella libertà when the English translation says 'hopes for freedom'?
When the verb sperare (to hope) is followed by a noun, it acts as an indirect-transitive verb, meaning it requires a preposition rather than a direct object. For sperare, that preposition is in. Since libertà is a feminine noun, in + la becomes nella.
Why is it condannato all'ergastolo? Does ergastolo just mean prison?
No, ergastolo specifically means 'life imprisonment' or a 'life sentence'. The verb condannare (to sentence or condemn) takes the preposition a to introduce the punishment, which combines with l'ergastolo to form all'ergastolo. If you wanted to just say 'prison', you would use prigione or carcere.

Learn Pur condannato all'ergastolo, spera nella libertà and more in Italian

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free