Dato che l'operazione era in pericolo, dubitavo che si fosse infiltrato nell'ufficio.

Questions & Answers about Dato che l'operazione era in pericolo, dubitavo che si fosse infiltrato nell'ufficio.

Why do we use the pluperfect subjunctive (si fosse infiltrato) instead of the imperfect subjunctive (si infiltrasse)?
This is about the sequence of tenses. The main verb dubitavo (I doubted) is in the past. Because the action of infiltrating happened before the doubting, we need a past-in-the-past tense. In the subjunctive mood, that is the pluperfect subjunctive. If you used si infiltrasse, it would mean the infiltration was happening at the exact same time you were doubting it.
What triggers the subjunctive mood in this sentence?
The verb dubitare (to doubt). When you express doubt, uncertainty, or personal opinion with a phrase like dubitavo che (I doubted that), Italian requires the following verb to be in the subjunctive mood.
Why is the auxiliary verb fosse (from essere) used here rather than avesse (from avere)?
The verb here is infiltrarsi (to infiltrate oneself), which is a reflexive verb. In Italian, all reflexive verbs must use essere as their auxiliary in compound tenses. So, we use fosse to form the pluperfect subjunctive.
Why is era in the indicative mood, rather than the subjunctive? Doesn't the sentence express doubt?
Only the second part of the sentence expresses doubt! The phrase Dato che means 'Given that' or 'Since', and it introduces a statement of fact or a cause. Because the operation being in danger is presented as a confirmed fact, era stays in the normal indicative mood.

Learn Dato che l'operazione era in pericolo, dubitavo che si fosse infiltrato nell'ufficio and more in Italian

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free