Om jag var ledig imorgon, skulle jag följa med dig till stranden.

Om means if.

It introduces the condition: Om jag var ledig imorgon ... = If I were free tomorrow ...

In Swedish, om is the normal word for if in conditional sentences.

Because this is a hypothetical or unreal condition.

Swedish often uses a past tense form to talk about something that is not actually true right now, even if it refers to the present or future. So:

• Om jag är ledig imorgon ... = If I am free tomorrow ...
  This sounds like a real possibility.
• Om jag var ledig imorgon ... = If I were free tomorrow ...
  This sounds more hypothetical or contrary to fact.

So var does not really indicate past time here. It helps mark the sentence as unreal or imagined.

Yes. Vore is also possible, and many learners meet it in conditional sentences.

• Om jag var ledig imorgon ...
• Om jag vore ledig imorgon ...

Both can mean the same thing here.

Very roughly:

• var is common and natural in everyday Swedish.
• vore can sound a bit more formal, careful, or traditional.

So if you hear or read vore, do not be surprised. But var is extremely common in normal spoken and written Swedish.

Ledig means free, off, or not working / not busy, depending on context.

In this sentence, ledig imorgon means free tomorrow or off tomorrow.

Some common examples:

• Jag är ledig idag. = I’m off today / I’m free today.
• Är du ledig på fredag? = Are you free on Friday?

It is a very common word when talking about availability.

Skulle here means would.

It is used in the result part of a hypothetical sentence:

• Om jag var ledig imorgon, skulle jag följa med dig ...
• If I were free tomorrow, I would come along with you ...

This is a very common Swedish pattern:

• Om ... , skulle ...

For example:

• Om jag hade tid, skulle jag hjälpa dig.
  If I had time, I would help you.

Because Swedish has verb-second word order in main clauses.

When the sentence begins with something other than the subject, the finite verb usually comes next. In this sentence, the first clause is:

• Om jag var ledig imorgon

After that, the main clause begins, and Swedish puts the finite verb first:

• skulle jag följa med dig till stranden

So Swedish says:

• ..., skulle jag ...

not:

• ..., jag skulle ...

This is one of the most important Swedish word-order rules.

Compare:

• Jag skulle följa med dig.
• Imorgon skulle jag följa med dig.
• Om jag var ledig imorgon, skulle jag följa med dig.

In all of these, the finite verb stays in the second position of the main clause.

Följa med means to come along, to go with someone, or to join someone.

Literally, följa means follow, and med means with, but together följa med is an idiomatic expression.

So:

• Jag följer med dig. = I’m coming with you.
• Vill du följa med? = Do you want to come along?

In your sentence:

• skulle jag följa med dig till stranden
• I would come along with you to the beach

It is a very common verb + particle combination, and in many sentences the med stays closely connected to följa.

For example:

• Jag följer med.
• Hon vill följa med oss.
• Skulle du följa med mig?

So learners should usually treat följa med as a unit meaning come along / go with.

That said, Swedish word order can sometimes place other words between parts of a verb phrase, but as a beginner it is safest to learn följa med together.

Because the two med elements do different jobs.

• In följa med, med is part of the verb expression: come along
• In med dig, the idea is with you

So:

• följa med = come along
• följa med dig = come along with you

This may look repetitive from an English-speaking perspective, but it is completely normal Swedish.

Till means to, and stranden means the beach.

So:

• till stranden = to the beach

Stranden is the definite form of strand:

• en strand = a beach
• stranden = the beach

You use till because the sentence expresses movement toward a place.

Because Swedish often uses the definite form where English uses the.

• strand = beach
• stranden = the beach

Since the meaning is to the beach, Swedish puts the definite ending on the noun instead of using a separate word like English the.

So:

• till strand would be wrong here
• till stranden is correct

Yes, very much so.

This sentence is a classic hypothetical conditional:

• Om jag var ledig imorgon = If I were free tomorrow
• skulle jag följa med dig till stranden = I would come with you to the beach

A more real or open condition would usually use present tense instead:

• Om jag är ledig imorgon, följer jag med dig till stranden.
• If I’m free tomorrow, I’ll come with you to the beach.

So the original sentence sounds more like an imagined situation than a simple future plan.

Yes. Swedish is fairly flexible with time expressions.

Your sentence has:

• Om jag var ledig imorgon, skulle jag följa med dig till stranden.

But you could also say:

• Om jag var ledig, skulle jag följa med dig till stranden imorgon.

The meaning is similar, but the focus shifts slightly:

• ledig imorgon emphasizes being free tomorrow
• putting imorgon later can emphasize when the trip would happen

Both are natural, depending on what you want to stress.

Not always.

In Swedish, commas before the main clause in sentences like this are often optional, especially in modern writing. So both of these can appear:

• Om jag var ledig imorgon, skulle jag följa med dig till stranden.
• Om jag var ledig imorgon skulle jag följa med dig till stranden.

The version with a comma can make the sentence easier to read, especially for learners. So the comma is fine, but it is not always required.