Jag vill ha sällskap till läkaren i morgon, för jag är fortfarande lite nervös.

Ha sällskap is the normal Swedish expression for have someone with you / have company / have companionship.

In this sentence, Jag vill ha sällskap till läkaren means:

• I want someone to go with me to the doctor
• or I’d like company at the doctor’s

A few useful points:

• sällskap is a common noun for company, companionship, someone accompanying you
• you usually do not need an article here, so ha sällskap sounds natural
• English often changes the wording more than Swedish does, so a direct word-for-word translation may sound a bit odd in English even though the Swedish is perfectly natural

Yes, literally it does mean to the doctor, and that is also how Swedish commonly expresses going to the doctor.

So:

• till läkaren = to the doctor
• Jag vill ha sällskap till läkaren = I want someone to come with me to the doctor

In natural English, we often say:

• to the doctor
• to my doctor’s appointment
• when I go to the doctor

Swedish often uses till for movement toward a place or destination, including appointments.

The ending -en is the definite article, so läkaren means the doctor.

Swedish often uses the definite form where English might also use the, especially when talking about a known or expected situation, such as:

• your usual doctor
• a scheduled visit
• the doctor in a general, familiar sense

Compare:

• till läkaren = to the doctor
• till en läkare = to a doctor

If you say till en läkare, it sounds less specific: any doctor, not a particular appointment or expected visit.

Yes. Doktorn is also very common in everyday Swedish.

Compare:

• till läkaren = a bit more neutral/formal
• till doktorn = very common, slightly more conversational

Both are natural. In many contexts they mean the same thing:

• Jag ska till läkaren
• Jag ska till doktorn

Both mean I’m going to the doctor.

Because i morgon means tomorrow, while på morgonen means in the morning.

So:

• i morgon = tomorrow
• på morgonen = in the morning

Examples:

• Vi ses i morgon. = See you tomorrow.
• Jag tränar på morgonen. = I work out in the morning.

Also, modern Swedish often writes imorgon as one word. Both i morgon and imorgon are accepted.

Because in a main clause, Swedish usually puts the finite verb before sentence adverbs like fortfarande.

So:

• jag är fortfarande lite nervös

Breakdown:

• jag = subject
• är = finite verb
• fortfarande = still
• lite nervös = a little nervous

This is normal Swedish main-clause word order.

A useful comparison:

• Main clause: Jag är fortfarande nervös.
• Subordinate clause: ... eftersom jag fortfarande är nervös.

So English speakers often need to pay attention to adverb position, because Swedish word order changes depending on clause type.

Yes, lite nervös means a little nervous or somewhat nervous.

Here lite softens the statement. It can make the sentence sound:

• less dramatic
• more natural
• more polite or understated

So:

• nervös = nervous
• lite nervös = a little nervous / somewhat nervous

Very often, Swedish uses lite in places where English might also use a bit:

• Jag är lite trött. = I’m a bit tired.
• Hon är lite orolig. = She’s a little worried.

Here för means because.

So:

• ..., för jag är fortfarande lite nervös. = ..., because I’m still a little nervous.

This is a very common everyday use of för when giving a reason.

Compare:

• för = because / for
• eftersom = because / since

In this sentence:

• för sounds natural and conversational
• eftersom would also work, but sounds a bit more formal or explanatory

Example:

• Jag vill ha sällskap ..., för jag är nervös.
• Jag vill ha sällskap ..., eftersom jag är nervös.

Both are correct.

Because the sentence is made of two clauses:

• Jag vill ha sällskap till läkaren i morgon
• för jag är fortfarande lite nervös

The comma helps separate them and makes the sentence easier to read.

In Swedish, a comma before för is common when för means because and introduces another clause. In less formal writing, people may sometimes omit commas more freely, but this comma is completely normal.

Often, yes. Jag vill ha literally means I want.

Depending on context, English may translate it as:

• I want
• I would like
• I’d like

In Swedish, vill ha is very common and not necessarily as blunt as I want can sound in English.

So in this sentence:

• Jag vill ha sällskap... can be understood as
  • I want company...
  • I’d like someone to come with me...

If you wanted to sound even softer in Swedish, you could say something like:

• Jag skulle vilja ha sällskap... = I would like to have company...

But Jag vill ha sällskap is already natural and normal.

Yes. Swedish is fairly flexible with time expressions.

The original sentence:

• Jag vill ha sällskap till läkaren i morgon

You could also say:

• I morgon vill jag ha sällskap till läkaren.

Both are correct, but the emphasis changes:

• Jag vill ha sällskap ... i morgon = neutral
• I morgon vill jag ha sällskap ... = puts more focus on tomorrow

This kind of movement is common in Swedish, but remember that if you put something first, the verb usually comes right after it:

• I morgon vill jag... not
• I morgon jag vill...

Yes, it is natural and idiomatic.

It sounds like something a real speaker might say if they want emotional support or someone to accompany them to a medical appointment.

A native speaker might also say close variants such as:

• Jag vill ha någon med mig till läkaren i morgon, för jag är fortfarande lite nervös.
• Jag vill gärna ha sällskap till läkaren i morgon, för jag är fortfarande lite nervös.
• Jag vill ha sällskap till doktorn i morgon, för jag är fortfarande lite nervös.

But your sentence is fully natural as it stands.