Después de que la panadera cierre, ya no quedará pan fresco en esa calle.

Because después de que normally takes the subjunctive when it refers to a future action that has not happened yet.

Here, the baker’s closing is still in the future, so Spanish says:

• Después de que la panadera cierre...

If it referred to something that had already happened, Spanish would usually use the indicative instead:

• Después de que la panadera cerró... = after the baker closed

So the contrast is basically:

• future / pending action → subjunctive
• past / completed action → indicative

Quedará is the future tense of quedar. It is used because the sentence is talking about what will be the case after the baker closes.

• quedará = will remain / will be left

So:

• ya no quedará pan fresco = there will no longer be fresh bread left

You could sometimes hear the present used for future meaning in conversation, but quedará is the most straightforward and natural choice here.

Ya no means no longer or not anymore.

So:

• ya no quedará pan fresco = there will no longer be fresh bread / there won’t be fresh bread anymore

A useful comparison:

• ya = already / now
• no = not
• ya no = no longer / not anymore

It often marks a change of situation:

• Before: there is fresh bread
• After the baker closes: ya no hay / ya no quedará

No. La panadera means the female baker or the baker woman.

That is a very common point of confusion because:

• panadero / panadera = baker
• panadería = bakery

So in this sentence:

• la panadera cierre = the baker closes
• not the bakery closes, even though English would often say after the bakery closes

Spanish could also say:

• Después de que cierre la panadería...

That would mean After the bakery closes...

In standard Spanish, the normal expression is después de que.

• después de que = after

So:

• Después de que la panadera cierre... = After the baker closes...

You may occasionally see or hear después que in some varieties, but después de que is the standard form learners should use.

Because the sentence begins with a subordinate time clause:

• Después de que la panadera cierre

When this kind of clause comes first, Spanish usually separates it from the main clause with a comma:

• Después de que la panadera cierre, ya no quedará pan fresco en esa calle.

If the order were reversed, the comma is often not needed:

• Ya no quedará pan fresco en esa calle después de que la panadera cierre.

Here, quedar means to remain or to be left.

So:

• quedará pan fresco = fresh bread will remain / there will be fresh bread left
• no quedará pan fresco = no fresh bread will remain / there won’t be any fresh bread left

This is a very common use of quedar when talking about what remains after something is used up, sold, or removed.

Examples:

• No queda leche. = There’s no milk left.
• Quedan dos entradas. = Two tickets are left.

In Spanish, adjectives usually come after the noun, especially when they describe a literal quality.

So:

• pan fresco = fresh bread

This is the normal order. Putting fresco before the noun would sound unusual here and would not be the standard way to say it.

Spanish has a three-way demonstrative system:

• esta = this
• esa = that
• aquella = that over there / that more distant one

So esa calle means that street.

The choice depends on how the speaker sees the distance, either physical or psychological. In this sentence, esa calle simply points to a specific street that is not presented as this one right here.

A learner does not need to overthink it too much here: esa calle is just a natural way to say that street.

Not with exactly the same meaning.

• Después de que la panadera cierre... = After the baker closes...
• Cuando la panadera cierre... = When the baker closes...

Both can refer to the future, and both would use the subjunctive here, but después de que makes the sequence more explicit: first the baker closes, and then there is no fresh bread left.

So cuando is possible in some contexts, but después de que is more precise for after.

Because the subject is singular:

• la panadera = the baker

So the verb must also be singular:

• cierre = he/she closes

If the subject were plural, the verb would change:

• Después de que las panaderas cierren... = After the bakers close...

No, not in this sentence.

Después de + infinitive is used when the subject is the same as in the main clause. For example:

• Después de cerrar, me fui a casa.
  = After closing, I went home.

Here, the subject of cerrar is la panadera, but the main clause does not have the same subject in that way. The natural structure is:

• Después de que la panadera cierre...

So a good rule is:

• después de + infinitive → same subject
• después de que + conjugated verb → different or explicitly stated subject

No. En esa calle means in/on that street, referring to location.

• ya no quedará pan fresco en esa calle = there will no longer be fresh bread on that street / in that street area

If you said de esa calle, it would usually suggest from that street, which is a different meaning.

So en is the correct preposition here because the sentence is talking about where fresh bread will no longer be available.