Log inSign up

El vecino al que le presté el trapeador me lo devuelve mañana.

El vecino al que le presté el trapeador me lo devuelve mañana.
The neighbor to whom I lent the mop will return it to me tomorrow.
FromLesson 42inHardcore Spanish (Latin America)

Questions & Answers about El vecino al que le presté el trapeador me lo devuelve mañana.

What does al que mean, and why not just que?
Al que literally means to the one (who/that). You need the preposition a because the verb prestar takes an indirect object with a (lend something to someone). In Spanish, when a relative pronoun follows a preposition, you can’t use bare que; you must use a form like el que/la que/los que/las que or quien/quienes. Also, al is the contraction of a + el.
Why is there a le in al que le presté el trapeador? Who does it refer to?
Le is the indirect object pronoun referring to al vecino. It’s clitic doubling: Spanish typically repeats the indirect object with a pronoun even when it’s also expressed as an a + phrase. So: Le presté el trapeador al vecino = I lent the mop to the neighbor. Inside the relative clause, al que le presté… is the same pattern.
Is that le optional here?
In this structure, it’s strongly preferred and often felt to be required. Many speakers would find al que presté el trapeador odd or wrong. With indirect objects referring to people—especially when they’re fronted or in a relative clause—Spanish almost always doubles with le/les.
Could I use a quien instead of al que?
Yes. El vecino a quien le presté el trapeador… is correct and a bit more formal. You could also say …al cual le presté… (more formal/literary). All three work.
Why al and not a el?
Spanish contracts a + el to al. So a el que becomes al que.
What does me lo mean in me lo devuelve?
Why is it me lo and not lo me?
Pronoun order rule: indirect object pronouns (me, te, le, nos, les/se) go before direct object pronouns (lo, la, los, las). Hence: me lo, te la, se los, never lo me.
Why not se lo devuelve mañana?
Se replaces le/les when combined with a third-person direct object pronoun (lo/la/los/las) to avoid le lo. But here the indirect object is first person (me), so it stays me: me lo devuelve. Se lo devuelve would mean “he returns it to him/her.”
Does lo agree with trapeador? What if the object were feminine or plural?

Yes, lo matches masculine singular. Change it to match the direct object:

  • Feminine singular: me la devuelve (e.g., la escoba)
  • Masculine plural: me los devuelve (e.g., los trapeadores)
  • Feminine plural: me las devuelve (e.g., las escobas)
What tenses are presté and devuelve, and why present for a future meaning?
  • presté: preterite, 1st person singular (I lent). It’s a finished past action.
  • devuelve: present, 3rd person singular. With a future time marker like mañana, Spanish often uses the present to express a scheduled/near-future event. You could also say me lo devolverá mañana or me lo va a devolver mañana.
Can I move mañana to another position?

Yes. Common options:

  • Mañana me lo devuelve.
  • Me lo devuelve mañana.
  • Mañana, el vecino… me lo devuelve. Word order changes emphasis, not meaning.
Is trapeador the standard word everywhere?

It’s common in much of Latin America for “mop.” Regional alternatives exist:

  • Mexico/Central America: trapeador, also mechudo in some areas
  • Argentina/Uruguay: lampazo
  • Caribbean: mapo/mapa in some places
  • Spain: fregona All are understandable regionally, but trapeador is a safe LatAm choice.
Could I say El vecino que le presté el trapeador…?
No. After a preposition like a, you can’t use bare que. Also, prestar needs the preposition a for the person. So you need al que/a quien: El vecino al que (a quien) le presté el trapeador…
Can I drop me and just say lo devuelve mañana?
You can, but then you’re no longer saying it’s returned to you. Lo devuelve mañana = “he returns it tomorrow” (to someone, unspecified). To keep “to me,” you need me. For emphasis, you can add a mí: A mí me lo devuelve mañana.
If it’s a female neighbor, what changes?

Make the nouns/pronouns feminine:

  • La vecina a la que le presté el trapeador me lo devuelve mañana. (Only la vecina and a la que change; trapeador remains masculine, so lo stays.)
Can I use regresar instead of devolver?
In much of Latin America, yes: me lo regresa mañana is very common. In Spain, devolver is the standard verb for “return (an item).” Devolver is always correct everywhere.
How do I say “He’s going to return it to me tomorrow”?

Two equally natural options:

  • Me lo va a devolver mañana.
  • Va a devolvérmelo mañana. (Both use ir a + infinitive; attaching the pronouns to the infinitive is optional.)
How does the sentence change with plurals?
  • Plural direct object: El vecino… me los devuelve mañana (e.g., multiple mops).
  • Plural neighbors (subject): Los vecinos a quienes les presté el trapeador me lo devuelven mañana.
  • Both plural: Los vecinos a quienes les presté los trapeadores me los devuelven mañana.
Why does presté have an accent but devuelve doesn’t?

Spanish accent rules:

Can the pronouns attach to other verb forms?

Yes:

AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“How does verb conjugation work in Spanish?”
Spanish verbs change form based on the subject, tense, and mood. Regular verbs follow predictable patterns depending on whether they end in ‑ar, ‑er, or ‑ir. For example, "hablar" (to speak) becomes "hablo" (I speak), "hablas" (you speak), and "habla" (he/she speaks) in the present tense.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Spanish

Master Spanish — from El vecino al que le presté el trapeador me lo devuelve mañana to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.

  • ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
Start learning Spanish freeBrowse the full course