Log inSign up

После семинара я сделал вывод и записал его в дневник.

После семинара я сделал вывод и записал его в дневник.
After the seminar, I drew a conclusion and wrote it down in my diary.

Breakdown of После семинара я сделал вывод и записал его в дневник.

я
I
в
in
и
and
после
after
записать
to write down
его
it
сделать
to make
семинар
seminar
дневник
diary
вывод
conclusion
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Russian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Russian now

Questions & Answers about После семинара я сделал вывод и записал его в дневник.

Why is it После семинара and not После семинар / После семинаром?

The preposition после (after) requires the genitive case.
So семинар (nominative) changes to семинара (genitive):

  • после чего? → после семинара
    This is a fixed rule for после.
What does я сделал вывод literally mean, and why is сделал used with вывод?

Literally it’s I made a conclusion/inference. In Russian, сделать вывод is a very common collocation (set phrase).
Other verbs can appear, but they sound different:

  • прийти к выводу = to come to a conclusion (more formal)
  • сформулировать вывод = to formulate a conclusion (more “report-like”)
Why is сделал in the past tense masculine form?

Russian past tense agrees with the subject in gender and number (not person).
Here the subject is я (I). The speaker is assumed male, so:

  • male speaker: я сделал
  • female speaker: я сделала
  • plural (we/they): мы/они сделали
Why is сделал perfective, and what would change with делал?

сделал (perfective) focuses on a completed result: you reached a conclusion (done).
делал (imperfective) would emphasize process/repetition and often sounds incomplete without context:

  • После семинара я делал вывод… = I was drawing a conclusion / I used to draw conclusions (needs more context) For a single finished action, perfective сделал is the natural choice.
What is the function of и here—does it mean two separate actions?

Yes. и connects two coordinated past actions: 1) я сделал вывод (I drew a conclusion)
2) (я) записал его в дневник (I wrote it down in a diary)
Russian often omits the repeated я because it’s understood.

What does его refer to, and why is it его?

его refers to вывод (conclusion). вывод is masculine, singular, inanimate.
In записал его, the pronoun is the direct object (accusative):

  • записал (кого? что?) → его (= it)
Why is it в дневник (accusative) and not в дневнике?

Because в + accusative typically indicates motion/direction into something (a destination):

  • записал в дневник = wrote it into the diary (entered it there)

в + prepositional indicates location (where something is happening):

  • писал в дневнике = was writing in the diary (location-focused)

Both can be possible with writing verbs, but записать в дневник is a very common “enter/write down into” pattern.

Should it be в мой дневник / в свой дневник instead of just в дневник?

Both are possible.

  • в дневник = into a/the diary (context supplies whose)
  • в мой дневник = into my diary (explicit)
  • в свой дневник = into his/her own diary; with я, it means my own and is often preferred stylistically because it links back to the subject.

So you might also see: …и записал его в свой дневник.

Is the word order flexible? Could I say Я после семинара сделал вывод…?

Yes, word order is flexible and changes emphasis:

  • После семинара я сделал вывод… = sets the time first (“After the seminar…”)
  • Я после семинара сделал вывод… = emphasizes I (maybe contrasting with someone else)
  • Я сделал вывод после семинара… = the time feels like an afterthought / less prominent

The original is very natural for “time → subject → action”.

What are the typical stresses (pronunciation) in this sentence?

Common stresses are:

  • по́сле
  • семина́ра
  • я сде́лал вы́вод
  • и записа́л его́ (often его is reduced/unstressed in fast speech, but stress его́ is the dictionary form)
  • в дневни́к