Log inSign up

Не стоит оставлять телефон на столе, когда идёшь в парк.

Не стоит оставлять телефон на столе, когда идёшь в парк.
It’s not worth leaving the phone on the table when you go to the park.

Breakdown of Не стоит оставлять телефон на столе, когда идёшь в парк.

в
to
парк
the park
телефон
the phone
на
on
не
not
идти
to go
когда
when
оставлять
to leave
стоить
to be worth
стол
table
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Russian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Russian now

Questions & Answers about Не стоит оставлять телефон на столе, когда идёшь в парк.

What does не стоит + infinitive mean grammatically, and who is the “subject”?

Не стоит is an impersonal construction (no real grammatical subject). It literally means something like “it’s not worth (doing)” or “one shouldn’t (do)”.
So Не стоит оставлять… = “It’s not worth leaving…” / “You shouldn’t leave…”.
The “doer” is understood from context (often you/people in general) rather than stated.

Why is оставлять in the infinitive, and what aspect is it?

After не стоит, Russian typically uses an infinitive to name the action being advised against.
Оставлять is imperfective (process/repeated/general). It suggests a general rule/habit: don’t (ever) leave your phone…
The perfective partner would be оставить (a single, completed act): Не стоит оставить телефон… is less natural; Russians would usually still prefer Не стоит оставлять… for general advice.

Could I also say Не стоит оставлять телефон на стол instead of на столе?

Not here.

  • на столе = location (on the table, where it is). This matches оставлять: you leave something somewhere.
  • на стол would normally mean movement onto the table (direction), used with verbs like положить/класть:
    • Не стоит класть телефон на стол… = “You shouldn’t put your phone on the table…”
Why is it на столе (Prepositional case)? What form is столе?

Because with на meaning “on (a surface) in a fixed location,” Russian uses the Prepositional case.
стол (dictionary form) → на столе (Prepositional singular).
It answers где? (“where?”): на столе.

Why is there a comma before когда?

Because когда идёшь в парк is a subordinate time clause (“when you go to the park”). In Russian, subordinate clauses are normally set off with a comma:
Не стоит…, когда…

What does когда идёшь mean exactly—present tense or future?

It’s present tense in form (идёшь), but it often expresses a general time situation:

  • “when you go (whenever you go)” / “when you’re going.”
    Russian frequently uses present-tense imperfective for general or repeated situations, even if in English you might choose different tenses.
Why is идёшь “you go” if the English translation might be “when going to the park” or “when you go”?

Russian commonly uses 2nd person singular (идёшь) to mean “you/one” in general (generic “you”), especially in advice.
It’s like English: “When you go to the park, don’t…”—not necessarily addressing one specific person, but often it is.

Could this be идёте instead of идёшь?

Yes, depending on who you’re addressing.

  • когда идёшь = informal you (to a friend) or generic “you.”
  • когда идёте = polite/formal you (to one person politely) or “you all” (plural).
    So: Не стоит оставлять телефон…, когда идёте в парк.
Why is it в парк and not в парке?

Because в changes case depending on meaning:

  • в парк (Accusative) = motion to/into the park (куда?).
  • в парке (Prepositional) = location in the park (где?).
    Here идёшь в парк means you’re heading to the park.
Is идти the best verb here? What about пойти or ходить?

All are possible with slightly different meaning:

  • идёшь в парк (from идти, imperfective) = “(you) are going / you go (on foot) to the park” in a general or current sense.
  • пойдёшь в парк (from пойти, perfective future) = “when you go (next time / once) to the park.”
  • ходишь в парк (from ходить, multidirectional imperfective) = “when you go to the park (regularly/as a habit).”
Why is телефон in the accusative (телефон)—it looks the same as nominative?
Because it’s the direct object of оставлять (“to leave something”). For inanimate masculine nouns like телефон, nominative = accusative in singular, so the form doesn’t change: телефон.
What’s the nuance difference between не стоит and нельзя or не надо?
  • не стоит = soft advice: “it’s not worth it / you shouldn’t (it’s a bad idea)”.
  • не надо = more direct recommendation: “don’t (you don’t need to / shouldn’t)”.
  • нельзя = prohibition/impossibility: “you mustn’t / it’s not allowed / you can’t.”
    So не стоит feels like cautionary advice rather than a strict rule.