Breakdown of Cheile mele nu sunt pe masă; sunt în sertarul de sus.
Questions & Answers about Cheile mele nu sunt pe masă; sunt în sertarul de sus.
Why is it cheile and not chei or cheia?
Because cheile is the definite plural form of cheie (key).
- cheie = a key
- cheia = the key
- chei = keys
- cheile = the keys
So cheile mele means my keys, not just keys of mine in a vague sense. Romanian often uses the definite article in phrases like this when English might simply say my keys.
Why does mele come after the noun?
In Romanian, possessives usually come after the noun, not before it as in English.
So:
- cheile mele = my keys
- literally, it is closer to the keys mine
This is normal Romanian word order. The possessive adjective agrees with the noun, but it typically follows it.
Why is it mele and not mei or meu?
Because mele has to agree with cheile in gender and number.
cheie is a feminine noun, and here it is plural, so the correct possessive form is mele.
Compare:
- cheia mea = my key
- cheile mele = my keys
- caietul meu = my notebook
- caietele mele = my notebooks
So the form changes depending on what noun it describes.
Why is nu placed before sunt?
Why is sunt used here?
Sunt is the present tense form of a fi (to be), and here it means are.
The subject is cheile mele (my keys), which is plural, so Romanian uses sunt.
- cheia mea este... = my key is...
- cheile mele sunt... = my keys are...
In everyday Romanian, you may also hear îs in some regions, but sunt is the standard form.
Why is it pe masă but în sertar?
Because the two prepositions describe different kinds of location:
- pe = on, for a surface
- în = in, for being inside something
So:
- pe masă = on the table
- în sertar = in the drawer
This is very similar to English usage:
- things are on a table
- things are in a drawer
Why is it masă without an article, not masa?
Because after many prepositions, Romanian often uses the noun without the definite article when the meaning is general or simply locational.
So:
- pe masă = on the table / on a table, depending on context
- pe masa = on the table, with a more explicitly definite form
In this sentence, pe masă sounds natural and idiomatic. Romanian does not always match English article usage one-for-one.
Why is it sertarul and not just sertar?
Sertarul means the drawer, while sertar means a drawer or just drawer.
Here, the speaker has a specific drawer in mind, especially because it is further identified by de sus (the top one / the upper one).
So:
- în sertar = in a drawer / in the drawer, depending on context
- în sertarul de sus = in the top drawer / in the upper drawer
The definite article helps make it specific.
What does de sus mean exactly?
De sus literally means from above or of above, but in this kind of phrase it means top, upper, or the one above.
So:
- sertarul de sus = the top drawer / the upper drawer
Similar patterns:
- camera de sus = the upstairs room / the room above
- raftul de jos = the bottom shelf
It is a very common Romanian way to describe position.
Why is the subject not repeated in the second part?
In sunt în sertarul de sus, Romanian leaves out the subject because it is already understood from the previous clause.
The full version would be:
- Cheile mele nu sunt pe masă; cheile mele sunt în sertarul de sus.
But repeating cheile mele would sound unnecessary. Romanian, like English, often omits repeated information when it is clear.
Why is there a semicolon instead of a comma or a period?
The semicolon connects two closely related statements:
- Cheile mele nu sunt pe masă
- sunt în sertarul de sus
The second part contrasts with and completes the first: not on the table; in the top drawer.
A period would also be possible:
- Cheile mele nu sunt pe masă. Sunt în sertarul de sus.
The semicolon simply shows a closer connection between the two ideas.
How is sertarul de sus different from sertarul superior?
Both can refer to an upper drawer, but sertarul de sus is the more natural, everyday expression.
- sertarul de sus = the top drawer / the upper drawer
- sertarul superior = the upper drawer, but more formal or technical
In ordinary speech, Romanian usually prefers de sus and de jos for this kind of physical location.
How do you pronounce the special Romanian letters here, like ă and î?
Two special vowels appear in the sentence:
- ă in masă
- î in în
A simple guide:
- ă is a short, neutral vowel, similar to the a in sofa
- î is a close central sound that does not exist exactly in English; you make a tight vowel sound deep in the center of the mouth
Roughly:
- masă sounds like MA-suh
- în is a short one-syllable word with that special î sound
Also, stress is usually:
- CHE-i-le
- ME-le
- MA-să
- ser-TA-rul
- sus
Could Romanian also say Cheile mele nu sunt pe masă, ci în sertarul de sus?
Yes. That version is also very natural.
- nu sunt pe masă; sunt în sertarul de sus = they are not on the table; they are in the top drawer
- nu sunt pe masă, ci în sertarul de sus = they are not on the table, but rather in the top drawer
Using ci makes the correction or contrast more explicit. Both are correct; the version with the semicolon is a little simpler in structure.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning RomanianMaster Romanian — from Cheile mele nu sunt pe masă; sunt în sertarul de sus to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions