Log inSign up

Na maratona, qualquer pequena distância parece enorme no fim.

Na maratona, qualquer pequena distância parece enorme no fim.
In a marathon, any small distance seems huge at the end.
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Portuguese grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Portuguese now

Questions & Answers about Na maratona, qualquer pequena distância parece enorme no fim.

What does na maratona literally mean, and what is na made of?

Na maratona literally means “in the marathon” or “in a marathon (context)”.

  • na is a contraction of em + a:
    • em = in / on / at
    • a = the (feminine singular definite article)
      → em + a = na

So:

  • na maratona = em a maratona = in the marathon.

Portuguese very often uses the definite article (a) with generic nouns, where English would just say “in a marathon” without the.

Why is it a maratona (feminine) and not o maratona?

In Portuguese, maratona is a feminine noun, so it takes the feminine article a:

  • a maratona = the marathon
  • uma maratona = a marathon

Most nouns ending in -a are feminine, and maratona follows that pattern:

  • a corrida (the race)
  • a prova (the event)
  • a maratona (the marathon)
Why is there a comma after Na maratona? Is it necessary?

The comma separates an introductory phrase:

  • Na maratona, qualquer pequena distância parece enorme no fim.
    = In a marathon, any small distance seems huge at the end.

Na maratona is an adverbial phrase (of place/situation) placed at the beginning for emphasis or context. In Portuguese, it’s common (and stylistically good) to use a comma after such an initial phrase.

You could technically drop the comma in some informal writing, but:

  • With comma → clearer and more standard.
  • Without comma → can feel a bit “run-on” or less polished.
What exactly does qualquer mean here, and how does it work grammatically?

In this sentence:

  • qualquer pequena distância ≈ any small distance

Key points about qualquer:

  1. Meaning

    • Before a noun, qualquer usually means any in a non‑specific sense:
      • qualquer dia = any day
      • qualquer pessoa = any person / anyone

  2. Form

    • Before a noun it is invariable in gender, but normally singular:
      • qualquer distância (feminine singular)
      • qualquer problema (masculine singular)
    • The rare plural form is quaisquer:
      • quaisquer distâncias = any distances (but this sounds formal / written).

  3. Position and nuance

    • Before the noun (as here):
      • qualquer pequena distância = any small distance (neutral, general)
    • After the noun, it changes nuance:
      • uma distância qualquer = some random distance / any old distance
        (often more dismissive or vague).

So qualquer pequena distância is the natural, neutral way to say any small distance in this context.

Why is it pequena distância and not distância pequena? Does word order change the meaning?

Both are grammatically correct, but the nuance is different:

  • pequena distância (adjective before noun)

    • Very idiomatic; often the default expression.
    • Sounds like a more inherent or expected quality: a short distance.
    • This is what Portuguese speakers naturally say in this context.

  • distância pequena (adjective after noun)

    • Puts a bit more focus or contrast on small: “a distance that happens to be small,” possibly contrasting with bigger ones.
    • Can sound more technical or emphatic, depending on context.

In a general statement like this, qualquer pequena distância is the natural collocation. Qualquer distância pequena is possible, just less usual and slightly more marked.

Why is distância singular? Would quaisquer pequenas distâncias also be correct?

Qualquer pequena distância uses the singular because:

  • qualquer + singular noun = any + singular noun (generic)
    → It already conveys a general idea (any such distance).

You could say:

  • Quaisquer pequenas distâncias parecem enormes no fim.

This is:

  • Grammatically correct (note quaisquer
    • distâncias
      • parecem).
  • More formal / literary; everyday speech rarely uses quaisquer.

In natural spoken Portuguese, qualquer + singular is strongly preferred for this kind of generalization.

Why is the verb parece (singular) and not parecem? What is the subject here?

The grammatical subject is qualquer pequena distância:

  • qualquer (any) + pequena (small) + distância (distance, singular)
    → overall: singular

So the verb must agree in the 3rd person singular:

  • Qualquer pequena distância parece enorme… ✅
  • Qualquer pequenas distâncias parecem enormes… ❌ (wrong agreement)

Even though the meaning feels plural-like (“any small distance you can think of”), grammatically it’s one (non‑specific) distance, so parece is correct.

Why use parece (“seems”) and not é (“is”)?

The verb choice reflects subjective perception vs objective fact:

  • parece enorme = seems / feels huge
  • é enorme = is huge (stating it as a fact)

In a marathon, the distance does not actually change; what changes is how it feels to you at the end. So:

  • Qualquer pequena distância parece enorme no fim.
    = Any small distance feels/looks/seems huge at the end.

Using é would sound like claiming that each small distance truly is huge in absolute terms, which isn’t the intended idea.

Could I say fica enorme or torna-se enorme instead of parece enorme?

You can, but the meaning shifts slightly:

  • parece enorme

    • Focus on appearance / perception:
      Any small distance seems huge (to you) at the end.

  • fica enorme

    • Focus on change of state:
      Any small distance becomes huge at the end.
    • This sounds more like “by that time, it has turned into something huge.”

  • torna-se enorme

    • Similar to fica, but more formal/literary:
      Any small distance turns into something huge at the end.

In this context, parece is the most natural, because the point is how your perception changes, not the physical distance.

What does no fim mean exactly, and how is it different from no final or no fim da maratona?

In this sentence:

  • no fim ≈ at the end (of the marathon), understood from context.

Details:

  1. no fim

    • em + o fim → no fim
    • General “at the end”:
      • no fim do dia = at the end of the day
      • Here: no fim (of the marathon) is implied.

  2. no fim da maratona

    • More explicit: at the end of the marathon.
    • You could safely say:
      • Na maratona, qualquer pequena distância parece enorme no fim da maratona.
    • That’s correct, just a bit longer and more repetitive.

  3. no final

    • final is a near-synonym of fim.
    • no final here would also work:
      • …parece enorme no final.
    • In everyday speech, no fim and no final are often interchangeable, though no fim is very common in European Portuguese.

So, no fim is a natural shorthand for “at the end (of it)” when the context (the marathon) is clear.

Is the word order fixed, or can I move na maratona or no fim to other positions?

Word order in Portuguese is quite flexible for adverbial phrases. These variants are all possible:

  • Na maratona, qualquer pequena distância parece enorme no fim.
  • Qualquer pequena distância, na maratona, parece enorme no fim.
  • Qualquer pequena distância parece enorme no fim, na maratona. (less natural)

You can also expand no fim:

  • Na maratona, qualquer pequena distância parece enorme no fim da prova.
  • No fim da maratona, qualquer pequena distância parece enorme.

Basic rules:

  • You normally keep qualquer pequena distância parece enorme together.
  • Phrases like na maratona and no fim (da maratona) can move to the beginning or end to change emphasis, but the core structure stays the same.
Is this sentence specifically European Portuguese, or would Brazilians say it the same way?

The sentence is perfectly fine in both European and Brazilian Portuguese:

  • Na maratona, qualquer pequena distância parece enorme no fim.

Possible tendencies:

  • In Brazil, no final might be slightly more common than no fim in this kind of sentence, but no fim is also used and understood.
  • In Portugal, no fim is very natural and common.

So a Brazilian might also say:

  • Na maratona, qualquer pequena distância parece enorme no final.

Grammatically and lexically, the structure is shared. The biggest difference is pronunciation, not wording.

How do you pronounce Na maratona, qualquer pequena distância parece enorme no fim in European Portuguese?

Approximate European Portuguese pronunciation (slashes show syllable breaks, stressed syllables in bold):

  • Na maratona → /na maɾaˈto.nɐ/

    • stress on to: ma-ra-TO-na

  • qualquer → /kwaɫˈkɛɾ/

    • dark l: kwaɫ-KÉR

  • pequena → /pɨˈke.nɐ/

    • the e in the first syllable is a reduced vowel: pɨ-KE-na

  • distância → /diʃˈtɐ̃.si.ɐ/

    • nasal sound in tã: dis-TÃ-si-a

  • parece → /pɐˈɾɛ.sɨ/

    • stress on ré: pa-RÉ-sɨ

  • enorme → /ɨˈnɔɾ.mɨ/

    • stress on nór: e-NÓR-mɨ

  • no fim → /nu ˈfĩ/

    • fim with a nasal vowel: fĩ

Spoken naturally, many vowels will reduce and link, but this gives you a solid guide to the European pronunciation.