Breakdown of I og med at jakkeslaget sitter feil, brukes skredderkritt.
Questions & Answers about I og med at jakkeslaget sitter feil, brukes skredderkritt.
What does i og med at mean?
I og med at is a conjunction meaning something like since, because, given that, or seeing that.
It introduces a reason or background explanation:
- I og med at jakkeslaget sitter feil ... = Since / given that the lapel sits incorrectly ...
It is often a bit more formal or explanatory than plain fordi.
Why is there an at after i og med?
In this sentence, i og med at works as a fixed expression that introduces a subordinate clause.
So you should learn it as one unit:
- i og med at + clause
Here the clause is:
- jakkeslaget sitter feil
Without at, the sentence would sound incomplete in this structure.
Why is there a comma after feil?
Because the first part is a subordinate clause, and it comes before the main clause:
- I og med at jakkeslaget sitter feil, = subordinate clause
- brukes skredderkritt. = main clause
In standard written Norwegian, it is normal to separate these with a comma.
Why is the word order ..., brukes skredderkritt instead of ..., skredderkritt brukes?
This is because of the V2 rule in Norwegian main clauses: the finite verb must come in the second position.
The whole subordinate clause counts as the first element:
- I og med at jakkeslaget sitter feil = position 1
So the finite verb of the main clause comes next:
- brukes = position 2
Then the subject follows:
- skredderkritt
So:
- I og med at jakkeslaget sitter feil, brukes skredderkritt.
Even though skredderkritt comes after the verb, it is still the grammatical subject of the main clause.
What does jakkeslaget mean, and how is it formed?
Jakkeslaget means the lapel.
It is a compound noun:
- jakke = jacket
- slag = lapel / facing / fold, depending on context
Together:
- jakkeslag = lapel
- jakkeslaget = the lapel
The ending -et shows that it is definite singular.
Does sitter really mean sits here?
Yes, but Norwegian uses sitte more broadly than English sit.
With clothing, furniture, or objects, sitte can mean:
- to fit
- to be positioned
- to lie/set in the right or wrong way
So jakkeslaget sitter feil does not mean the lapel is literally sitting like a person. It means the lapel is positioned wrongly or doesn’t sit correctly.
This use is very common in Norwegian.
What is feil doing here? Is it an adjective or an adverb?
Here feil is being used adverbially, meaning wrongly or incorrectly.
So:
- sitter feil = sits wrong / is positioned incorrectly
Norwegian often uses feil this way after verbs:
- skrive feil = write incorrectly / make a mistake
- si feil = say something wrong
- sitte feil = sit wrongly / fit wrongly
So even though feil is often taught as wrong or mistake, here it functions more like incorrectly.
What kind of form is brukes?
Brukes is the s-passive form of bruke.
- bruke = to use
- brukes = is used / are used
So this is a passive sentence:
- brukes skredderkritt = tailor’s chalk is used
Norwegian has two common ways to make the passive:
- brukes
- blir brukt
In many cases, both are possible. The -s passive often sounds compact and is common in written or formal styles.
Why is there no article before skredderkritt?
Because skredderkritt is being used in a general, material-like sense here, not as one specific countable item.
So the sentence means something like:
- tailor’s chalk is used
- not necessarily a tailor’s chalk is used
This is similar to how English often leaves out the article with materials or tools in a general statement.
If you wanted to talk about one specific piece, the wording would likely change.
What does skredderkritt mean literally?
It is a compound noun:
- skredder = tailor
- kritt = chalk
So skredderkritt literally means tailor chalk or tailor’s chalk.
Norwegian makes a lot of compound nouns like this, and English speakers often need practice recognizing them as one unit.
Could I replace i og med at with fordi?
Yes, in many contexts you could.
For example:
- Fordi jakkeslaget sitter feil, brukes skredderkritt.
That would still make sense.
The difference is mostly in tone:
- fordi = straightforward because
- i og med at = more like given that / seeing that / since
So i og med at can sound a bit more explanatory or formal.
Is this sentence in the present tense because it is describing a general procedure?
Yes. Both verbs are in the present tense:
- sitter = sits / is positioned
- brukes = is used
Norwegian often uses the present tense for:
- general truths
- instructions
- routine procedures
- descriptions of how something is done
So the sentence sounds like a general statement about what is done in this situation, not necessarily only about one single event happening right now.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning NorwegianMaster Norwegian — from I og med at jakkeslaget sitter feil, brukes skredderkritt to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions