Breakdown of Hun snakker med arbeidsgiveren om omsorgspermisjonen og arbeidsforholdet.
Questions & Answers about Hun snakker med arbeidsgiveren om omsorgspermisjonen og arbeidsforholdet.
Why is it Hun and not henne?
Hun is the subject form of she. In this sentence, she is the person doing the action, so Norwegian uses hun.
- Hun = she
- Henne = her
So:
- Hun snakker ... = She is talking ...
- Jeg ser henne. = I see her.
Why is it snakker and not snakke?
Snakker is the present tense of å snakke (to speak / to talk).
- å snakke = infinitive, to speak
- snakker = present tense, speaks / is speaking / talks / is talking
So:
- Hun snakker = She speaks / She is speaking
- Hun vil snakke = She wants to speak
In Norwegian, the present tense is often made by adding -r to the infinitive.
Why are both med and om used here?
They do two different jobs:
- med = with / to, showing who she is talking with
- om = about, showing what she is talking about
So the structure is:
- snakker med arbeidsgiveren = talks with the employer
- om omsorgspermisjonen og arbeidsforholdet = about the care leave and the employment relationship
This is very normal in Norwegian:
- snakke med noen om noe = talk with someone about something
Why do the nouns end in -en or -et?
Those endings mark the definite form, which often corresponds to English the.
Examples from the sentence:
- arbeidsgiveren = the employer
- omsorgspermisjonen = the care leave
- arbeidsforholdet = the employment relationship
In Norwegian, the definite article is usually attached to the end of the noun instead of being a separate word before it.
Compare:
- en arbeidsgiver = an employer
arbeidsgiveren = the employer
- et arbeidsforhold = an employment relationship
- arbeidsforholdet = the employment relationship
Why is it arbeidsgiveren but arbeidsforholdet?
Because the nouns have different grammatical genders.
In Bokmål:
- en arbeidsgiver → arbeidsgiveren
- en omsorgspermisjon → omsorgspermisjonen
- et arbeidsforhold → arbeidsforholdet
So:
- nouns with en usually take -en in the definite singular
- nouns with et usually take -et in the definite singular
That is why the last noun ends differently.
Why are these nouns definite at all? Why not just use the indefinite form?
The definite form suggests that these are specific, known things, not just general topics.
So omsorgspermisjonen suggests a particular leave that both speaker and listener know about, and arbeidsforholdet suggests a specific employment relationship or job situation.
Compare:
- Hun snakker om omsorgspermisjon. = She is talking about care leave in general.
- Hun snakker om omsorgspermisjonen. = She is talking about the specific care leave.
English sometimes leaves this vaguer, but Norwegian often makes the distinction clearly.
What do these long compound words mean literally?
Norwegian makes a lot of compound nouns, and this sentence has several of them.
arbeidsgiver
- arbeid = work
- giver = giver
- literally: work-giver
- actual meaning: employer
omsorgspermisjon
- omsorg = care
- permisjon = leave
- actual meaning: care leave
arbeidsforhold
- arbeid = work
- forhold = relationship / condition / circumstance
- actual meaning: employment relationship or work situation, depending on context
A useful rule: in Norwegian compounds, the last part is the main noun, and it usually determines the gender.
Why is there an s in omsorgspermisjonen and arbeidsforholdet?
That s is a very common linking element in Norwegian compounds.
So:
- omsorg + permisjon → omsorgspermisjon
- arbeid + forhold → arbeidsforhold
This s does not mean possession here. It just helps join the parts of the compound. English does something similar in fixed expressions sometimes, but Norwegian uses compound linking much more regularly.
Does om apply to both omsorgspermisjonen and arbeidsforholdet?
Yes. The preposition om covers both nouns:
- om omsorgspermisjonen og arbeidsforholdet
This means:
- about the care leave
- and about the employment relationship
Norwegian does not need to repeat om before the second noun when both nouns are part of the same phrase.
You could repeat it for emphasis or clarity in some contexts, but it is not necessary here.
Could the word order be changed to Hun snakker om omsorgspermisjonen og arbeidsforholdet med arbeidsgiveren?
Yes, that is grammatically possible, but it changes the flow and emphasis a little.
Hun snakker med arbeidsgiveren om ...
This is the most neutral order if you want to present who she is speaking with first.Hun snakker om ... med arbeidsgiveren
This puts more focus on what the conversation is about.
Both can work, but the original sentence sounds very natural and straightforward.
Does snakker med mean talks with or talks to?
It can often be understood as either, depending on context.
- snakke med noen = talk with someone / talk to someone
In many everyday situations, English distinguishes between with and to only slightly, and Norwegian often uses med in both kinds of situations.
So Hun snakker med arbeidsgiveren can naturally be understood as:
- She is talking with the employer
- She is talking to the employer
The exact nuance depends on the situation, not just the grammar.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning NorwegianMaster Norwegian — from Hun snakker med arbeidsgiveren om omsorgspermisjonen og arbeidsforholdet to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions