Breakdown of Clementia bona est, si aequa manet et iustitiae non nocet.
Questions & Answers about Clementia bona est, si aequa manet et iustitiae non nocet.
Why is clementia the subject, and what case is it?
Clementia is in the nominative singular, so it is the subject of the sentence.
- clementia = clemency, mercy
- nominative singular ending: -a (for a first-declension noun)
So the basic structure is:
- Clementia bona est = Clemency is good
Everything after that explains under what condition clemency is good.
Why is it bona est and not bonum est?
Because bona must agree with clementia.
In Latin, adjectives agree with the noun they describe in:
- gender
- number
- case
Since clementia is:
- feminine
- singular
- nominative
the adjective must also be feminine singular nominative:
- bona = good
So:
- clementia bona est = clemency is good
If the noun were neuter, then you might see bonum.
What does si do in this sentence?
Si means if and introduces a conditional clause.
So the sentence means:
- Clemency is good, if...
The two conditions are:
- si aequa manet = if it remains fair
- et iustitiae non nocet = and does not harm justice
So the structure is:
- main clause: Clementia bona est
- condition: si aequa manet et iustitiae non nocet
Why is there no word for it in si aequa manet?
Because Latin often leaves out subject pronouns when they are understood from context.
In si aequa manet, the subject is still clementia, carried over from the first clause.
So Latin does not need to say ea (it/she) here. It is understood:
- si aequa manet = if it remains fair
This is very common in Latin. English usually needs the pronoun, but Latin often does not.
Why is it aequa?
Aequa is an adjective agreeing with clementia.
Like bona, it is:
- feminine
- singular
- nominative
because it describes clementia.
So:
- aequa = fair, just, even-handed
- si aequa manet = if it remains fair
This is another example of adjective agreement.
What exactly does manet mean here?
Manet is from maneo, manere, meaning:
- to remain
- to stay
- to continue to be
Here it means remains:
- si aequa manet = if it remains fair
Grammatically:
- manet = 3rd person singular present active indicative
It matches the singular subject clementia.
Why is iustitiae not iustitiam?
Because noceo takes the dative, not the direct object accusative.
The verb here is nocet, from noceo, nocere, meaning:
- to harm
- to do harm to
In Latin, the person or thing harmed is put in the dative case.
So:
- iustitiae = to justice / justice
- non nocet = does not harm
This is an important verb pattern to remember:
- noceo + dative
So Latin says literally:
- and does not harm to justice
but in natural English:
- and does not harm justice
What form is nocet?
Nocet is from noceo, nocere.
It is:
- 3rd person singular
- present
- active
- indicative
So it means:
- he/she/it harms
- here: it harms
Since the subject is still clementia, the meaning is:
- and it does not harm justice
Why is there an et inside the si clause?
Because the sentence gives two conditions joined by et (and).
The idea is:
Clemency is good if
- it remains fair, and
- it does not harm justice.
So et connects:
- aequa manet
- iustitiae non nocet
Both belong under the condition introduced by si.
Is the word order normal? Could Latin arrange this differently?
Yes, the word order is normal, but Latin is flexible.
This sentence is arranged quite clearly:
- Clementia bona est = main statement first
- si aequa manet et iustitiae non nocet = condition after it
Latin could rearrange words for emphasis, for example:
- Si aequa manet et iustitiae non nocet, clementia bona est.
- Clementia, si aequa manet et iustitiae non nocet, bona est.
Because endings show the grammatical roles, Latin does not depend on word order as much as English does.
Why are the verbs in the present indicative instead of some special conditional form?
Because this is a simple real condition.
Latin often uses:
- si
- present indicative
- present indicative in the main clause
for a general truth or straightforward condition.
So:
- Clementia bona est, si aequa manet et iustitiae non nocet.
means something like:
- Clemency is good if it remains fair and does not harm justice.
There is no need for a special subjunctive here, because the condition is presented as a real, general principle.
Does clementia mean exactly the same thing as English clemency?
Not always exactly. Clementia can mean:
- clemency
- mercy
- mildness
- leniency
Depending on context, it can suggest a merciful attitude, especially in judgment or punishment.
In this sentence, the idea is that mercy is good only when it stays balanced and does not conflict with justice.
So the Latin word overlaps strongly with English clemency, but the full sense may be a little broader.
What is the overall grammar pattern of the sentence?
A helpful way to break it down is:
- Clementia = subject
- bona est = predicate
- si... = conditional clause
More fully:
- Clementia — nominative singular subject
- bona — predicate adjective agreeing with clementia
- est — linking verb
- si — introduces the condition
- aequa — adjective agreeing with the understood subject clementia
- manet — verb, remains
- et — joins the two verbs in the condition
- iustitiae — dative after nocet
- non nocet — does not harm
So the sentence is a clear example of:
- a main clause
- followed by a conditional clause
- with adjective agreement
- and a verb that takes the dative
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Clementia bona est, si aequa manet et iustitiae non nocet to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions