Log inSign up

Discipula scribit in tabula: “Veritas semper vincit, quamquam mendacium saepe latet.”

Discipula scribit in tabula: “Veritas semper vincit, quamquam mendacium saepe latet.”
The female student writes on the board: “Truth always wins, although a lie often lies hidden.”
FromLesson 12inHardcore Latin
AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“What's the best way to learn Latin grammar?”
Latin grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Latin

Master Latin — from Discipula scribit in tabula: “Veritas semper vincit, quamquam mendacium saepe latet.” to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.

  • ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
Start learning Latin freeBrowse the full course

More from this lesson

navisportusNavis in portu stat.exireNoli foris exire, quia nox obscura est.Nauta navem parat ut cras e portu exeat.duocivis

Questions & Answers about Discipula scribit in tabula: “Veritas semper vincit, quamquam mendacium saepe latet.”

Why is discipula used instead of discipulus, and what case is it?
Discipula means female student (as opposed to discipulus, male student). Here it is nominative singular, the subject of scribit.
How do we know scribit means “(she) writes,” and what tense is it?

Scribit is 3rd person singular present indicative active of scribere (to write).

  • The ending -it marks he/she/it in the present tense.
  • The subject pronoun (she) is usually not stated in Latin because the verb ending already shows the person/number.
Why is it in tabula (ablative) and not in tabulam (accusative)?

With in:

  • in + ablative = location (in/on the board), answering “where?”
  • in + accusative = motion toward (onto/into the board), answering “where to?”

So in tabula (ablative) treats the board as the place where the writing appears. You could also see in tabulam if the writer emphasizes the idea of writing onto it as a kind of “movement,” but in tabula is straightforward for “on the board.”

What case is tabula, and why does it look like that?
Tabula is ablative singular (1st declension). The ablative singular ending for most 1st-declension nouns is -ā, so it is tabulā (often written without the long mark in basic texts).
Is the word order unusual in Discipula scribit in tabula?

It’s normal. Latin word order is flexible because meaning is largely carried by endings. A very common neutral pattern is Subject – Verb – (prepositional phrase), as here:

  • Discipula (subject) + scribit (verb) + in tabula (where).

You could also see in tabula discipula scribit if the writer wants to emphasize where she is writing.

Why are there quotation marks, and is that “real” Latin punctuation?
The punctuation (colon and quotation marks) is mainly modern editorial practice to make the direct speech clear. Ancient Latin manuscripts didn’t use quotation marks the way English does. In learning materials, quotes are commonly added for clarity.
In Veritas semper vincit, what forms are veritas and vincit?
  • Veritas is nominative singular (3rd declension), the subject: “truth.”
  • Vincit is 3rd person singular present indicative active of vincere: “(it) conquers/wins.”

So the grammar is simply subject + verb, with semper as an adverb.

What’s the difference between semper and saepe?

Both are adverbs of frequency, but they are different:

  • semper = always
  • saepe = often

So the sentence contrasts an absolute statement (truth always wins) with a frequent-but-not-absolute one (a lie often lies hidden).

Why does quamquam use the indicative here, and could it take the subjunctive?

In Classical Latin, quamquam (“although”) typically introduces a clause with the indicative, especially when stating a fact:

  • quamquam mendacium saepe latet uses latet (present indicative).

In later Latin (and sometimes in more rhetorical contexts), you may find subjunctive after quamquam, but the “default” expectation for learners is indicative.

Why is mendacium nominative—shouldn’t “a lie” be an object?

In quamquam mendacium saepe latet, mendacium is the subject of latet:

  • mendacium = “a lie” (subject)
  • latet = “lies hidden / is hidden”

So it’s not “truth conquers a lie” (which would need an accusative object like mendacium as object in a different structure). It’s two separate statements:

  • Truth wins
  • Although a lie often hides
What does latet literally mean, and why use it instead of a passive like “is hidden”?
Latet is from latēre, meaning to lie hidden / to be hidden / to escape notice. Latin often uses active forms with this meaning rather than a passive construction. So mendacium latet is a very idiomatic way to express “the lie is hidden” or “the lie goes unnoticed.”
What is the function of the comma before quamquam?
It separates the main clause (Veritas semper vincit) from the concessive subordinate clause introduced by quamquam (quamquam mendacium saepe latet). It’s a readability/punctuation choice, similar to English writing.