Breakdown of Noli foris exire, quia nox obscura est.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Noli foris exire, quia nox obscura est to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.
- ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
More from this lesson
Questions & Answers about Noli foris exire, quia nox obscura est.
Latin commonly forms a negative command with noli (singular) or nolite (plural) + an infinitive.
- noli is literally be unwilling / don’t want (to) (2nd person singular imperative of nolo, nolle).
- So Noli exire is literally Don’t want to go out, used idiomatically as Don’t go out. This is one of the standard Latin ways to make a negative imperative, especially in Classical Latin.
They differ only in who is being addressed:
- noli = don’t (you, singular)
- nolite = don’t (you all / you, plural) So if speaking to more than one person, you would say: Nolite foris exire, quia nox obscura est.
Yes. foris can also be:
- a noun meaning door (less common; more often forēs = doors, plural)
- in some contexts, it can look like a form related to forīs (genitive/ablative of foris, foris in some usages)
But in a sentence like this, placed with a verb of motion (exire), it is naturally read as the adverb outside.
exire is the present active infinitive of exeō, exīre, exiī/exīvī, exitum = to go out.
With noli, Latin uses the infinitive: noli + infinitive.
Yes. Another common negative command uses nē with the present subjunctive, especially in some authors and styles:
- Nē forīs exeās = Don’t go outside (addressing one person) That said, noli + infinitive is extremely common and straightforward.
quia means because and introduces a causal clause (a reason):
- Main clause: Noli foris exire = the command
- quia-clause: quia nox obscura est = the reason for the command
In such clauses, Latin normally uses the indicative when giving a straightforward reason (as here).
Often, yes:
- quod can also mean because
- quoniam often means since / seeing that They overlap a lot in meaning, though authors may prefer one over another depending on style and nuance. In many beginner contexts, quia is the go-to because.
Latin doesn’t need a dummy subject like English it. Instead, it uses a real noun:
- nox est = it is night (literally night is) Here nox obscura est means the night is dark. The noun nox is the grammatical subject.
Both are nominative singular feminine:
- nox (subject) is nominative singular
- obscura agrees with nox in case, number, and gender and functions as a predicate adjective with est
So: nox = night, obscura = dark (describing the night).
Latin word order is flexible because endings show grammatical roles. Putting est at the end is very common and often sounds natural:
- nox obscura est But you could also see:
- nox est obscura
- obscura nox est All can mean the same basic thing, with small differences in emphasis.
A common Classical pronunciation (approximate) is:
- Noli: NO-lee (long ō, long ī)
- foris: FO-ris
- exire: ek-SEE-reh (with x = ks)
- quia: KWI-ah
- nox: noks
- obscura: ob-SKOO-rah
- est: est
Putting it together: NO-lee FO-ris ek-SEE-reh, KWI-ah noks ob-SKOO-rah est.