Log inSign up

Nauta navem parat ut cras e portu exeat.

Nauta navem parat ut cras e portu exeat.
The sailor prepares the ship so that tomorrow it may leave the harbor.
FromLesson 12inHardcore Latin
AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“What's the best way to learn Latin grammar?”
Latin grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Latin

Master Latin — from Nauta navem parat ut cras e portu exeat to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.

  • ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
Start learning Latin freeBrowse the full course

More from this lesson

navisportusNavis in portu stat.exireNoli foris exire, quia nox obscura est.duocivisvenditor

Questions & Answers about Nauta navem parat ut cras e portu exeat.

Why does navem end in -em? Is it “the ship” or “a ship”?

Navem is accusative singular of navis, navis (f.), a 3rd‑declension noun. It’s the direct object of parat (he prepares): the sailor prepares the ship.
Latin doesn’t have a/the as separate words, so navem can be translated “a ship” or “the ship” depending on context.

Why are nauta and navem different cases? How do I tell which is the subject?

Nauta is nominative singular and is the subject of parat (the sailor).
Navem is accusative singular and is the object (the ship).
A common beginner rule: the nominative is typically “who/what does the verb,” and the accusative is “who/what is acted on,” even if word order changes.

What tense is parat, and how do I know it means “is preparing” / “prepares”?

Parat is 3rd person singular present indicative active of parō, parāre.
The Latin present can cover both English “prepares” and “is preparing”; Latin doesn’t require a separate progressive form.

Why is ut used here? What exactly does ut ... exeat mean?

Here ut introduces a purpose clause: “in order that …” / “so that …”.
So ut cras e portu exeat means “so that it may leave the harbor tomorrow.” Purpose clauses typically take the subjunctive in Latin.

Why is exeat subjunctive? What form is it?

Because after ut expressing purpose, Latin uses the subjunctive mood.
Exeat is 3rd person singular present subjunctive active of exeō, exīre (to go out, depart). It corresponds to English “may leave / would leave / can leave” depending on context.

Why is it exeat and not exit (indicative)? What’s the difference in meaning?

Exit would be a plain statement: “it leaves / it is leaving.”
Exeat (subjunctive) in a purpose clause is not stating a fact; it expresses the goal/intention of the action: the sailor prepares the ship with the aim that it leave tomorrow.

Who is supposed to leave—does exeat refer to the sailor or the ship?

Grammatically, exeat is 3rd singular, and the most natural subject is navis (implied from navem): he prepares the ship so that *it may leave tomorrow.
If the sailor were the one leaving, you’d normally see something like *ut cras e portu exeat nauta (or a different structure), but as written the ship is the expected subject.

Why is cras placed where it is? Does word order matter?

Cras means “tomorrow” and is an adverb. Latin word order is flexible; cras can move for emphasis or style.
Placing cras early in the purpose clause highlights the time: “so that tomorrow it may depart…”

Why is it e portu and not just portu? What case is portu?

E (or ex) is used with the ablative to mean “out of / from.”
Portu is ablative singular of portus, portūs (4th declension). So e portu = “from/out of the harbor.”

When do I use e vs ex?
Both mean “out of/from.” A common guideline: use ex before a vowel or certain consonant clusters for ease of pronunciation, and e otherwise. In practice, authors vary, and both can appear.
What is navem parat literally—does it mean “gets the ship ready,” “repairs,” “equips”…?

Parat is broad: “prepares, makes ready, gets ready.”
So navem parat can cover getting the ship ready to sail (checking supplies, rigging, etc.). If the Latin wanted “repairs,” you’d more likely see a verb like reficit or reparat.

Could Latin drop the navem and just say parat ut ... exeat?
Often yes. Latin can omit an object if it’s obvious from context. But including navem makes it explicit what is being prepared, and it helps clarify that the ship is the thing expected to depart in the purpose clause.
Is there anything unusual about nauta as a noun?
Yes: nauta is 1st declension in form (ends in -a) but typically masculine in meaning (a sailor). So you treat it as 1st declension for endings, but it refers to a male person unless context suggests otherwise.