Breakdown of Postea clamor in foro iterum minuitur, quia iudex testem interrogat et tacere iubet.
in
in
et
and
forum
the forum
quia
because
tacere
to be silent
iterum
again
clamor
the noise
iubere
to order
iudex
the judge
testis
the witness
interrogare
to question
minuere
to decrease
postea
afterward
AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“What's the best way to learn Latin grammar?”
Latin grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Postea clamor in foro iterum minuitur, quia iudex testem interrogat et tacere iubet to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.
- ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
More from this lesson
Questions & Answers about Postea clamor in foro iterum minuitur, quia iudex testem interrogat et tacere iubet.
Why does postea come first, and what exactly does it mean here?
Postea is an adverb meaning afterwards / later. Latin often puts time expressions at the beginning to set the scene. It doesn’t “pull” any special grammar with it; it just modifies the whole sentence.
What case is clamor, and how do I know it’s the subject?
Clamor is nominative singular (a 3rd-declension noun). Since minuitur is a singular verb and there’s no other nominative noun competing as subject in the main clause, clamor is the subject: the shouting/noise diminishes.
What is in foro doing—why is it ablative?
In foro means in the forum/marketplace. With in meaning location (not motion), Latin uses the ablative: in + ablative = in/within (a place). (Forum, fori is 2nd declension; foro is ablative singular.)
Why is it iterum and where can it appear in the sentence?
Iterum is an adverb meaning again. Adverbs in Latin are flexible in placement. Here it sits near the verb idea (minuitur) to show that the diminishing happens again. You could also see it earlier or later without changing the core meaning.
What tense/voice is minuitur, and why is it passive?
Minuitur is present passive indicative, 3rd person singular, from minuo, minuere (to lessen/diminish). Literally it’s is diminished, but in English we usually translate it naturally as an intransitive: the noise dies down / diminishes. Latin often uses a passive where English would use an active/intransitive feel.
Does minuitur mean “is reduced (by someone)” or just “gets quieter”?
Grammatically it’s passive (is reduced), but without an expressed agent (no ab/ā + ablative) it commonly functions like gets reduced / diminishes. In context with clamor, the natural sense is it gets quieter.
What kind of clause does quia introduce, and does it affect mood?
Quia introduces a causal clause: because ... With quia, the verb is normally indicative, as here (interrogat, iubet). (Other causal conjunctions like cum can trigger the subjunctive in some uses, but quia usually doesn’t.)
How do I parse iudex testem interrogat?
- iudex = judge (nominative singular, subject)
- testem = witness (accusative singular, direct object)
- interrogat = questions/interrogates (present active indicative)
So: the judge questions the witness.
Why is testem accusative, and what declension is it?
Testem is accusative because it’s the direct object of interrogat (and also the person being ordered in tacere iubet). The noun is testis, testis (commonly 3rd declension), with accusative singular testem.
In tacere iubet, why is tacere an infinitive?
Iubeō commonly takes an infinitive to express what someone is ordered to do: iubet tacere = orders (someone) to be silent. This is a standard Latin pattern: iubeō + infinitive.
Who is supposed to tacere (be silent) if there’s no explicit “him/her” in Latin?
The person ordered to be silent is understood from context: it’s the same person the judge is dealing with, testem (the witness). Latin often omits an explicit pronoun like eum when it’s obvious.
Why is there an et between interrogat and tacere iubet? Is it linking equal actions?
Yes. Et coordinates two verbs with the same subject (iudex):
- interrogat (questions)
- iubet (orders)
So: the judge questions the witness and orders (him) to be silent. The second verb has its own complement (tacere).
Can the word order be changed, and what would stay the same?
Latin word order is flexible because endings mark roles. For example, Iudex testem interrogat could be Testem iudex interrogat without changing “who does what to whom.” However, the chosen order often reflects emphasis and flow: Postea first sets time; clamor in foro sets the scene; then the reason follows with quia.