Log inSign up

Puer clavem invenit et matri dicit se eam in via invenisse.

Puer clavem invenit et matri dicit se eam in via invenisse.
The boy finds the key and tells his mother that he found it in the street.

Breakdown of Puer clavem invenit et matri dicit se eam in via invenisse.

in
in
puer
the boy
et
and
mater
to the mother
dicere
to tell
via
the street
eam
it
se
himself
clavis
the key
invenire
to find
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Latin grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Latin now

Questions & Answers about Puer clavem invenit et matri dicit se eam in via invenisse.

Why is clavem not clavis?

Because clavem is the accusative singular of clavis, clāvis (key). It’s the direct object of invenit (found), so Latin uses the accusative:

  • puer (subject, nominative)
  • clavem (object, accusative)
What case is matri, and why is it used?

matri is dative singular of māter, mātris (mother). The dative is used for the indirect object, i.e. the person to whom something is said:

  • matri dicit = he says to (his) mother
Why does Latin say matri instead of something like ad matrem?

Latin commonly uses the dative with verbs of speaking/telling to mean to someone, without a preposition. ad + accusative can mean to/toward, but it often emphasizes movement toward or direction, not simply the recipient of speech. Here, matri is the standard choice.

What is going on with se eam ... invenisse? Why isn’t it just invenit eam?

This is an indirect statement after dicit (he says). Latin typically expresses “he says that …” using accusative + infinitive, not a finite that-clause.

So:

  • dicit = he says
  • se ... invenisse = that he had found ... (literally: himself to have found)

Latin doesn’t use a word for that here; the construction itself signals indirect speech.

Why is se used instead of eum?

se is the reflexive pronoun in indirect statement, referring back to the subject of the main verb (puer). So it means “himself” = “he” (the boy).

If you used eum, it would usually mean some other male person, not the boy:

  • dicit se invenisse = he says he (the boy) found it
  • dicit eum invenisse = he says that guy found it
What does eam refer to, and why is it feminine?

eam means her/it (accusative singular feminine) and refers to clavem (key), because clāvis is feminine in Latin. Pronouns must match their antecedent in gender and number (and take whatever case their job requires).

Here eam is the object of invenisse, so it’s accusative.

Why is the infinitive invenisse (perfect), not invenire (present)?

Because the finding happened before the speaking. In indirect statement, Latin often uses:

  • present infinitive for action happening at the same time as the main verb
  • perfect infinitive for action happening before the main verb

So dicit ... invenisse = he says that he found / had found.

What tense is invenit here—present or perfect?

invenit (from inveniō) can be either present (he finds) or perfect (he found) depending on context. In many story-like sentences, it’s often taken as perfect (found), especially since the later clause reports what he says about that completed action.

(Your provided meaning decides which one is intended.)

Why does Latin keep the subject puer only once, even though there are two verbs (invenit and dicit)?

Because both verbs share the same subject, and Latin doesn’t need to repeat it:

  • Puer ... invenit et ... dicit = The boy found ... and says ...

The conjunction et simply links two actions by the same subject.

What case is in via, and why?

viā is ablative singular with the preposition in. With in meaning in/on (location, not motion), Latin uses the ablative:

  • in viā = in the road / on the street

(If in meant into, it would take the accusative.)

Why is the word order different from English—especially matri dicit and se eam ... invenisse?

Latin word order is flexible because meaning is carried mostly by endings (cases, verb forms). The sentence is arranged in a natural Latin way:

  • Puer clavem invenit (main event)
  • et matri dicit (to whom he speaks comes early)
  • se eam in via invenisse (the content of what he says)

Placing matri before dicit highlights the recipient, and putting the infinitive phrase after dicit is standard for indirect statement.

Why does Latin say in via without an article like the?
Classical Latin has no definite or indefinite articles (the/a). Context supplies that information. So clavem can mean a key or the key, and in via can be in a road or on the street, depending on the situation.