Log inSign up

In illo loco prope portam puella sedet et epistulam iterum legit.

In illo loco prope portam puella sedet et epistulam iterum legit.
In that place near the gate the girl sits and reads the letter again.
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Latin grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Latin now

Questions & Answers about In illo loco prope portam puella sedet et epistulam iterum legit.

Why is in illo loco in the ablative, and what does each word do?

Because in (meaning in/on when talking about location) takes the ablative.

  • in = preposition
  • illo = ablative singular masculine/neuter of ille, illa, illud (that)
  • loco = ablative singular of locus (place)
    So in illo loco literally means in that place.
How do I know illo agrees with loco?

Latin adjectives/demonstratives agree with their nouns in case, number, and gender.

  • loco is ablative singular masculine (from locus)
  • illo is also ablative singular masculine
    So they match, which tells you they belong together.
Why is prope portam using the accusative (portam) instead of the ablative?

prope is one of the prepositions that normally takes the accusative (even though it expresses location/near-ness).

  • prope = near
  • portam = accusative singular of porta (gate)
    So prope portam = near the gate.
Could prope ever take another case?
In standard learner Latin, treat prope as accusative-only. In some poetry or later/less common usage you may see variation, but for reading typical prose, prope + accusative is the rule.
What tells me puella is the subject?
puella is nominative singular, which is the normal case for the subject of a finite verb. Also the verbs sedet and legit are 3rd person singular, matching she.
Why does Latin put puella after the prepositional phrases?

Latin word order is flexible. It often places setting information first (where/when), then introduces the main subject, then the verbs.
So In illo loco prope portam sets the scene, and puella comes after that.

What tense and person is sedet, and what verb is it from?
sedet is 3rd person singular present active indicative from sedēre (to sit). It means she sits / she is sitting.
Why is epistulam in the accusative?

Because it is the direct object of legit (reads). Direct objects are typically in the accusative.

  • epistulam = accusative singular of epistula (letter)
What tense is legit here—and isn’t legit sometimes perfect?

Yes, legit can be either:

  • present: he/she reads (from legere)
  • perfect: he/she read/has read (same spelling in many texts)

Here, iterum (again) and the coordination with sedet strongly point to the present: she sits and reads again.

How does iterum work in the sentence? Does it modify the whole sentence or just legit?
iterum is an adverb meaning again. In this sentence it most naturally modifies legit: she reads the letter again. Latin can move adverbs around for emphasis, but the sense is usually clear from context.
Why is there only one subject (puella) even though there are two verbs (sedet and legit)?
Latin often uses one subject for multiple verbs joined by et. The subject puella is understood with both verbs: the girl sits and reads.
Could Latin have used -que instead of et? What’s the difference?

Yes, it could be sedet epistulamque iterum legit (and attached to the second item).

  • et is the normal standalone and.
  • -que is an enclitic meaning and, often a bit tighter/closer in linking.
    In many prose contexts, both are fine, with only slight stylistic differences.
How would I pronounce In illo loco prope portam puella sedet et epistulam iterum legit in (classical-style) Latin?

A rough classical-style guide (stress marked in CAPS):

  • in IL-lo LO-co PRO-pe POR-tam PU-el-la SE-det et e-PIS-tu-lam I-te-rum LE-git
    Notes:
  • c is always hard (like k)
  • v is like w
  • stress typically falls on the second-to-last syllable if it’s heavy; otherwise on the third-to-last.