המחיר כולל גם משלוח, ולכן לא צריך לשלם עליו שוב.

כולל is the present-tense form of the verb לכלול (to include).

In this sentence, the subject is המחיר (the price), which is masculine singular, so the verb is also masculine singular: כולל.

A useful contrast:

• המחיר כולל משלוח = The price includes delivery
• המשלוח כלול במחיר = The delivery is included in the price

So כולל is the active idea (includes), while כלול is more like included.

גם means also, too, or as well.

In המחיר כולל גם משלוח, it tells you that delivery is an additional thing included in the price.

Its position is important: it comes right before the thing being added.

• כולל גם משלוח = includes delivery too
• If you moved גם, the emphasis could shift slightly.

So here, גם highlights משלוח as another included item.

In Hebrew, את is usually used before a definite direct object.

Here we have:

• המחיר כולל גם משלוח

Because משלוח is not marked as definite here, there is no את.

Compare:

• המחיר כולל גם משלוח = the price includes delivery / shipping
• המחיר כולל גם את המשלוח = the price also includes the delivery

The second version sounds more specific, as if both speaker and listener already know which delivery is being discussed.

Without ה־, משלוח is being used in a more general sense: delivery/shipping as a service or fee.

So:

• כולל גם משלוח = includes delivery
• כולל גם את המשלוח / כולל גם המשלוח is about a specific, known delivery

In many practical sentences about prices, Hebrew often leaves words like משלוח indefinite when talking about the general charge or service.

ולכן means and therefore, so, or and that’s why.

It is made of:

• ו־ = and
• לכן = therefore / so

It sounds a bit more formal or written than simple אז (so), but it is still very common and natural.

Compare:

• המחיר כולל גם משלוח, ולכן... = slightly more formal/structured
• המחיר כולל גם משלוח, אז... = more conversational

Here לא צריך is being used in an impersonal way, like:

• there is no need to...
• you don’t need to...
• one doesn’t need to...

Hebrew often uses masculine singular צריך in this general, subject-less way.

So לא צריך לשלם עליו שוב does not necessarily mean he doesn’t need to pay for it again. It often just means there’s no need to pay for it again.

If you wanted to address someone specific, you could say:

• אתה לא צריך לשלם עליו שוב = you (masc. sg.) don’t need to pay for it again
• את לא צריכה לשלם עליו שוב = you (fem. sg.) don’t need to pay for it again

עליו is the preposition על (on / for / about) plus the pronoun הוא (he/it), giving on it / for it / about it, depending on context.

Here it means for it.

So:

• על + הוא = עליו

In this sentence, עליו refers back to משלוח.

Also, with לשלם, Hebrew often uses על when talking about paying for something:

• לשלם על משלוח = to pay for delivery
• לשלם עליו = to pay for it

So the phrase is natural Hebrew: לא צריך לשלם עליו שוב.

Usually, no—not in this sentence.

With לשלם, Hebrew often works differently depending on what follows:

• לשלם על משהו = to pay for something
• לשלם למישהו = to pay someone
• sometimes לשלם את החשבון / את המחיר = to pay the bill / the price

But for delivery/shipping, Hebrew very naturally says:

• לשלם על המשלוח
• לשלם עליו

So לשלם אותו would sound wrong here.

שוב means again.

In this sentence, putting it at the end is very natural:

• לא צריך לשלם עליו שוב

That is the normal word order for pay for it again.

Hebrew adverbs like שוב are often flexible, but not every position sounds equally natural. The end position here is smooth and common.

You may also hear:

• לא צריך שוב לשלם עליו

but לא צריך לשלם עליו שוב is the most straightforward and natural phrasing in this context.

Yes. A very common alternative would be:

• המשלוח כלול במחיר, אז לא צריך לשלם עליו שוב.
• המשלוח כלול במחיר, ולכן לא צריך לשלם עליו שוב.

This version starts with the delivery is included in the price instead of the price includes delivery.

Both are correct. The difference is mainly in focus:

• המחיר כולל גם משלוח focuses on the price
• המשלוח כלול במחיר focuses on the delivery

Hebrew uses both patterns very naturally.