מחר אני אלך לספרייה עם מחברת, עט ועיפרון.

A common pronunciation is:

Machar ani elekh la-sifriya im machberet, et ve-iparon.

A few notes:

• מחר = machar (the ch is like the sound in German Bach, not like English ch in chair)
• אני = ani
• אלך = elekh
• לספרייה = la-sifriya
• עם = im
• מחברת = machberet
• עט = et
• ועיפרון = usually pronounced ve-iparon

מחר means tomorrow, and Hebrew often puts time expressions near the beginning of a sentence.

So:

• מחר אני אלך לספרייה... = Tomorrow I will go to the library...

This is very natural in Hebrew. But Hebrew word order is fairly flexible, so you could also hear:

• אני אלך מחר לספרייה...

That said, starting with מחר is a very common and natural way to frame the sentence.

Yes. אלך already shows first person singular: I will go.

So technically, אני is not always necessary. Hebrew often drops subject pronouns when the verb already makes the subject clear.

You can say:

• מחר אלך לספרייה... = Tomorrow I’ll go to the library...

Adding אני can:

• make the sentence a little clearer
• add emphasis
• sound more natural in some contexts

So both are correct.

אלך is the future tense form of the verb ללכת (to go / to walk).

In this sentence:

• אלך = I will go

This form is specifically:

• 1st person singular
• future tense

Hebrew usually does not use a separate word like English will. Instead, the future meaning is built directly into the verb form.

So:

• English: I will go
• Hebrew: אלך

Because Hebrew normally expresses future time through the verb form itself, not by adding a separate helping verb like English will.

Compare:

• English: I will go
• Hebrew: אלך

So in Hebrew, the future is built into the conjugation.

The word מחר also helps reinforce that this is about the future, but even without it, אלך already means I will go.

לספרייה is made of two parts:

• ל־ = to
• הספרייה = the library

Together:

• ל + הספרייה = to the library

In Hebrew, prepositions like ל־ (to), ב־ (in), and כ־ (as/like) often attach directly to the following word.

Also, when ל־ is added to a noun with ה־ (the), the form usually contracts:

• ל + הספרייה → לספרייה

This is why it appears as one word and why you do not see the ה separately.

In Hebrew, very common prepositions are usually written as prefixes attached to the next word.

So:

• ל־ = to
• ב־ = in
• כ־ = as / like

They are normally not written as separate words before a noun.

That is why Hebrew writes:

• לספרייה = to the library

not:

• ל הספרייה

Because Hebrew has no indefinite article. English uses a or an, but Hebrew usually does not.

So:

• מחברת can mean a notebook
• עט can mean a pen
• עיפרון can mean a pencil

If Hebrew wants to say the notebook / the pen / the pencil, it adds ה־:

• המחברת = the notebook
• העט = the pen
• העיפרון = the pencil

So in your sentence, the meaning is simply:

• with a notebook, a pen, and a pencil

even though Hebrew does not use a separate word for a.

עם means with.

So:

• עם מחברת, עט ועיפרון = with a notebook, a pen, and a pencil

It is the normal Hebrew preposition for accompaniment: going somewhere with something or someone.

Examples:

• עם חבר = with a friend
• עם תיק = with a bag

That is the normal way to list items in Hebrew, just as in English.

Here:

• מחברת, עט ועיפרון

means:

• a notebook, a pen, and a pencil

The ו־ means and, and it usually appears before the final item in a list.

So:

• ו = and
• ועיפרון = and a pencil

The letter ו as a prefix means and, but its pronunciation can vary slightly depending on what follows.

In many simple explanations, learners are taught:

• ו־ = ve-

So here:

• ועיפרון = ve-iparon

In actual speech, Hebrew speakers may reduce or blend sounds a bit, but ve- is the standard pronunciation to learn.

The nouns are:

• ספרייה (library) — feminine
• מחברת (notebook) — feminine
• עט (pen) — masculine
• עיפרון (pencil) — masculine

In this particular sentence, the genders do not affect the form very much, because there are no adjectives or number words agreeing with them.

But gender does matter in Hebrew in general, because adjectives, numbers, and sometimes verbs can agree with nouns.

Yes, absolutely.

That would still be grammatical and natural, because אלך already tells you the subject is I.

So both are possible:

• מחר אני אלך לספרייה...
• מחר אלך לספרייה...

The version with אני may sound a bit more explicit or slightly more emphatic.

Yes, it is natural and correct.

A native speaker might also say slightly different but equally natural versions, for example:

• מחר אני הולך לספרייה עם מחברת, עט ועיפרון.
• מחר אלך לספרייה עם מחברת, עט ועיפרון.

Why the variation?

In everyday spoken Hebrew, speakers sometimes use the present tense to talk about a planned future event, especially when a time word like מחר is present.

So both of these can be natural:

• אני אלך = more clearly future, a bit more formal or neutral
• אני הולך מחר = very common in speech for a planned future action

Here are the main words and their dictionary forms:

• מחר — dictionary form is the same: מחר = tomorrow
• אני — dictionary form is the same: אני = I
• אלך — from ללכת = to go
• לספרייה — from ספרייה = library
• עם — dictionary form is the same: עם = with
• מחברת — dictionary form is the same: מחברת = notebook
• עט — dictionary form is the same: עט = pen
• ועיפרון — from עיפרון = pencil; the ו־ is just and

This is useful because Hebrew often adds prefixes directly onto words, so learners need to get used to spotting the base form inside the full written form.