Breakdown of Bevor die Kinder wiederkommen, wische ich die Krümel weg und lege den Topflappen neben den Herd.
Questions & Answers about Bevor die Kinder wiederkommen, wische ich die Krümel weg und lege den Topflappen neben den Herd.
Why is the verb at the end in Bevor die Kinder wiederkommen?
Because bevor is a subordinating conjunction meaning before. In German, a clause introduced by a subordinating conjunction sends the conjugated verb to the end of that clause.
So:
- die Kinder kommen wieder = the children come back
- bevor die Kinder wiederkommen = before the children come back
Here, wiederkommen is the full verb, and in the subordinate clause it appears at the end.
Why does the main clause start with wische ich instead of ich wische?
Because the sentence begins with the subordinate clause Bevor die Kinder wiederkommen. That whole clause takes the first position in the sentence. In German main clauses, the conjugated verb must come second.
So the structure is:
- [Bevor die Kinder wiederkommen] [wische] [ich] ...
This is a very common pattern:
- Wenn ich Zeit habe, gehe ich spazieren.
- Bevor die Kinder wiederkommen, wische ich die Krümel weg.
So wische ich is required by normal German word order here.
Is wiederkommen a separable verb? Why is it written as one word here?
Yes, wiederkommen is usually treated as a separable verb in this meaning: to come back / return.
In a normal main clause, it separates:
- Die Kinder kommen wieder. = The children come back.
But in a subordinate clause, separable verbs usually rejoin and appear as one word at the end:
- ..., bevor die Kinder wiederkommen.
So:
- main clause: kommen ... wieder
- subordinate clause: wiederkommen
Why is it wische ... weg? Is wegwischen a separable verb too?
Yes. wegwischen is a separable verb meaning something like to wipe away.
In a main clause, it separates:
- Ich wische die Krümel weg.
In a subordinate clause, it would be joined:
- ..., weil ich die Krümel wegwische.
This is the same basic pattern as with many separable verbs in German.
What exactly is die Krümel grammatically?
Krümel means crumbs. Here it is:
- plural
- accusative case
- the direct object of wische ... weg
The article die can mean several things in German, but here it is plural nominative/accusative. Since the crumbs are what gets wiped away, this is accusative plural.
Singular would be:
- der Krümel = the crumb
Plural:
- die Krümel = the crumbs
Why is there no second ich before lege?
Because the same subject, ich, applies to both verbs:
- wische ich die Krümel weg
- und lege den Topflappen neben den Herd
German often leaves out the repeated subject when it is clearly the same in coordinated clauses.
So this is equivalent to:
- ..., wische ich die Krümel weg und ich lege den Topflappen neben den Herd.
But repeating ich would usually sound unnecessary here.
Why is it den Topflappen?
Because Topflappen is a masculine noun: der Topflappen.
In this sentence, it is the direct object of lege, so it takes the accusative case:
- nominative: der Topflappen
- accusative: den Topflappen
So:
- Ich lege den Topflappen ... = I put the oven mitt / pot holder ...
Why is it neben den Herd and not neben dem Herd?
Because neben is a two-way preposition. It can take:
- dative for location: where something is
- accusative for direction/movement: where something is being put
Here, the verb legen implies movement to a new position: the speaker is placing the oven mitt next to the stove. So German uses the accusative:
- neben den Herd = to next to the stove
Compare:
- Der Topflappen liegt neben dem Herd. = The oven mitt is next to the stove.
- location, so dative
- Ich lege den Topflappen neben den Herd. = I put the oven mitt next to the stove.
- movement, so accusative
What is the difference between legen and liegen here?
This is a very common German pair:
- legen = to lay / put something somewhere
- usually takes a direct object
- shows movement or placement
- liegen = to lie / be lying somewhere
- no direct object in this meaning
- shows location or state
So here:
- Ich lege den Topflappen neben den Herd. = I put the oven mitt next to the stove.
- Der Topflappen liegt neben dem Herd. = The oven mitt is lying next to the stove.
English often uses put and is instead, but German makes a clear distinction.
Why is there a comma after wiederkommen?
Because German uses a comma to separate a subordinate clause from the main clause.
So in:
- Bevor die Kinder wiederkommen, wische ich ...
the comma marks the end of the bevor clause.
This comma is required in standard German punctuation.
Does der Herd mean just a stove, or can it mean an oven too?
Der Herd usually means stove or cooker/range as the kitchen appliance in general. In many contexts, it refers to the cooking unit as a whole, not just the burners.
So depending on context, English translations might vary a little:
- stove
- cooker
- sometimes range
But in this sentence, next to the stove is a natural translation.
Could I also say bevor die Kinder zurückkommen instead of wiederkommen?
Yes, often you could. Both can mean come back / return, but they are not always identical in tone or usage.
- wiederkommen = come back, come again
- zurückkommen = return, come back to a previous place
In many everyday contexts, both work:
- Bevor die Kinder wiederkommen ...
- Bevor die Kinder zurückkommen ...
But wiederkommen is very natural in everyday speech here.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning GermanMaster German — from Bevor die Kinder wiederkommen, wische ich die Krümel weg und lege den Topflappen neben den Herd to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions