Learn Hardcore German: Die Veränderung in unserer Straße ist klein, aber sie tut der Lebensqualität gut. - The change in our street is small, but it is good for our quality of life.

Die Veränderung in unserer Straße ist klein, aber sie tut der Lebensqualität gut.

The change in our street is small, but it is good for our quality of life.

Breakdown of Die Veränderung in unserer Straße ist klein, aber sie tut der Lebensqualität gut.

Elon.io is an online learning platform

We have an entire course teaching German grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning German now

Questions & Answers about Die Veränderung in unserer Straße ist klein, aber sie tut der Lebensqualität gut.

What does „tut der Lebensqualität gut“ literally mean, and why is tun used instead of sein?

Literally, „sie tut der Lebensqualität gut“ means “it does (some) good to the quality of life”.

tun = “to do”
gut = “good(ly)”
jemandem/etwas gut tun = “to be good for someone/something / to do someone/something good.”

In English, we normally say “It is good for the quality of life”, using “to be”.
German often prefers the verb tun in this idiom:

Das tut mir gut. = That does me good / That is good for me.
Sport tut der Gesundheit gut. = Sport is good for your health.

So „sie tut der Lebensqualität gut“ is an idiomatic way to say “it is beneficial for the quality of life.”

Why is it „der Lebensqualität“ and not „die Lebensqualität“?

Lebensqualität is a feminine noun:

nominative singular: die Lebensqualität
dative singular: der Lebensqualität

The phrase „jemandem/etwas gut tun“ requires the dative for the thing that benefits from something.

So:

Who or what benefits? → der Lebensqualität (dative)
That’s why die changes to der:
- Nominative: Die Lebensqualität ist hoch. – The quality of life is high.
- Dative: Es tut der Lebensqualität gut. – It is good for the quality of life.

Why does „gut tun“ take the dative case?

The pattern „jemandem/etwas gut tun“ is fixed and always uses the dative for the person/thing that receives the benefit.

Think of it as:

„etwas tut jemandem gut“
→ literally: “something does good to someone”.

In German, the “to” idea is normally built into the dative, not expressed with a separate preposition:

Das tut mir gut. – That does me good. (good to me)
Frische Luft tut der Gesundheit gut. – Fresh air is good for your health.
Die Veränderung tut der Lebensqualität gut. – The change is good for the quality of life.

So the dative here answers “to whom/what is it good?”

Why is it „in unserer Straße“ and not „in unsere Straße“?

The preposition in can take accusative or dative:

Accusative = motion into something (direction)
Dative = location in something (no movement)

In the sentence:

„Die Veränderung in unserer Straße ist klein…“

the street is just the place where the change occurs; there is no movement into the street being described. So in takes the dative:

feminine noun die Straße
dative singular feminine → der Straße
with unser- (our), dative feminine ending is -er → unserer Straße

Examples:

Wir gehen in unsere Straße. (accusative, motion into the street)
Wir wohnen in unserer Straße. (dative, location in the street)

Why does „unserer Straße“ end in -er?

Because of gender + case:

Straße is feminine.
The preposition in here expresses location, so it needs dative.
Feminine dative singular uses the article der (not die).
The possessive unser behaves like the article and takes the same ending as an adjective would in that slot.

So:

Nominative: unsere Straße (our street)
Dative: in unserer Straße (in our street)

Some parallel examples:

mit meiner Schwester – with my sister (dative feminine)
auf dieser Straße – on this street (dative feminine)

Why is the pronoun „sie“ used, and not „es“?

„sie“ refers back to „Die Veränderung“, which is:

Veränderung – feminine noun
nominative singular article: die Veränderung
matching pronoun: sie (she/it) in German

Pronouns in German must match the grammatical gender of the noun, not the natural gender (and not English logic). So for veränderung:

Die Veränderung ist klein, aber sie tut der Lebensqualität gut.

If the noun were masculine or neuter, the pronoun would change:

Der Wechsel ist klein, aber er tut der Lebensqualität gut.
Das Projekt ist klein, aber es tut der Lebensqualität gut.

Could you also say „aber sie ist gut für die Lebensqualität“? Is there a difference?

Yes, you can say that, and it is perfectly correct:

„Die Veränderung … ist klein, aber sie ist gut für die Lebensqualität.“

Differences:

Grammar
- tut der Lebensqualität gut → verb + dative + adjective
- ist gut für die Lebensqualität → sein
  - adjective + für
    - accusative
Style / feel
- „tut … gut“ is a bit more idiomatic and can sound slightly more natural in everyday German.
- „ist gut für …“ is more transparent for English speakers and is also very common.

Meaning-wise, they are almost identical: both mean “it is good for the quality of life.”

What’s the difference between „Veränderung“ and „Änderung“?

Both can mean “change”, but there are typical tendencies:

Änderung
- More about a specific modification or adjustment.
- Often used for concrete, limited changes:
  - eine kleine Änderung am Plan – a small change to the plan
  - Programmänderung – change in the program/schedule
Veränderung
- Often suggests a more general or noticeable change, sometimes gradual.
- Can refer to changes in conditions, environment, lifestyle, personality:
  - gesellschaftliche Veränderungen – societal changes
  - Veränderungen im Stadtbild – changes in the cityscape

In the sentence „Die Veränderung in unserer Straße“, it’s about the street having changed in some way (appearance, traffic, atmosphere, etc.), so Veränderung fits well. Änderung would not be wrong, but Veränderung sounds a bit more natural for this context.

Why is the verb in second position in both clauses: „ist“ and „tut“?

German main clauses follow the V2 (verb-second) rule:

The conjugated verb must come in second position in the clause.
“Second” means second element, not necessarily the second word.

First clause:

Die Veränderung in unserer Straße = first element (subject + its phrase)
ist = second element (main verb)
klein = rest of the clause

→ Die Veränderung in unserer Straße ist klein…

Second clause (after aber):

aber is a coordinating conjunction; it does not take the verb to the end.
sie = first element (subject)
tut = second element (verb)
der Lebensqualität gut = rest

→ aber sie tut der Lebensqualität gut.

So the verb in each main clause stays in the second position, even after aber.

What exactly does „klein“ describe here? Could you also say „gering“ or „wenig“?

Here „klein“ describes the extent/size of the change:
„Die Veränderung … ist klein“ = The change is small / minor.

Alternatives:

gering
- Often used in more formal or abstract contexts: geringe Unterschiede, geringe Risiken.
- „Die Veränderung ist gering“ is possible and sounds a bit more formal, maybe slightly more technical.
wenig
- Is usually a quantifier (“little, few”), not an adjective for “small” in this sense.
- „Die Veränderung ist wenig“ is not natural German.

So:

klein = natural, neutral: a small change.
gering = also possible, more formal.
wenig = wrong in this structure.

Is „gut tun“ a separable verb? Why are „tut“ and „gut“ apart?

„gut tun“ is not a separable prefix verb like „aufstehen“ (auf + stehen).

Instead, it’s a verb + adjective construction:

verb: tun
adjective: gut

The adjective gut is placed after the object in this pattern:

Das tut mir gut.
Sport tut der Gesundheit gut.
Die Veränderung tut der Lebensqualität gut.

This is similar to English word order in phrases like “It does me good.”
So tut … gut is just verb + complement, not a single separable verb.

Why is „Lebensqualität“ written as one word in German?

German likes to create compound nouns by joining words:

Leben (life) + Qualität (quality) → Lebensqualität (quality of life)

A few points:

The -s- in the middle is a common linking element (Fugen-s).
Spelling it as two words („Lebens Qualität“) would be incorrect.
German often packs whole English phrases into a single compound noun:
- Arbeitszeit – working time
- Datenschutz – data protection
- Lebensqualität – quality of life

So „Lebensqualität“ is a standard compound noun and must be written as one word.