Si le logiciel plante encore demain, essaie de redémarrer l’ordinateur ; peut-être que le curseur bougera normalement ensuite.

Because after si for a real condition, French normally uses the present tense, even when the meaning is future.

So French says:

• Si le logiciel plante demain...
• literally: If the software crashes tomorrow...

Then the result clause can use the future, the imperative, the present, etc. In this sentence, the result is an imperative:

• ..., essaie de redémarrer l’ordinateur.

So si + future is normally not used here in standard French.

Yes. In computing, planter is a very common informal verb meaning to crash, to freeze, or to stop working properly.

So:

• Le logiciel plante = The software is crashing / crashes
• L’ordinateur a planté = The computer crashed

Its basic literal meaning is still to plant, but in tech contexts the computer meaning is very common.

Encore can mean different things depending on context, especially again or still.

So Si le logiciel plante encore demain can suggest:

• If the software crashes again tomorrow
• or If the software is still crashing tomorrow

In many real situations, context tells you which nuance is intended. French often leaves that kind of small distinction to context.

Because this is the imperative form, not the normal tu present form.

Compare:

• tu essaies = you try
• essaie ! = try!

In the tu imperative, French usually drops the subject pronoun and, with most -er verbs, also drops the final -s.

So:

• Tu essaies de redémarrer.
• Essaie de redémarrer !

You may also see the spelling essaye; both essaie and essaye are accepted.

Because essayer is commonly followed by de + infinitive when it means to try to do something.

So:

• essaie de redémarrer = try to restart
• essaie de comprendre = try to understand

Also, using essaie de... makes the instruction a bit softer and more practical than a direct command like redémarre l’ordinateur. It sounds like give this a try rather than a strict order.

French usually needs an article before a noun, especially a countable noun like ordinateur.

Here l’ordinateur means the computer, referring to the relevant computer in the situation.

It becomes l’ instead of le because ordinateur begins with a vowel sound:

• le ordinateur → not used
• l’ordinateur → correct

This is called elision.

Because peut-être is a fixed adverb meaning maybe or perhaps.

In modern standard French, the adverb is normally written with a hyphen:

• Peut-être que... = Maybe... / Perhaps...

Without the hyphen, peut être can be understood more literally as a verb phrase meaning can be.

So the hyphen helps show that this is the set expression meaning perhaps.

Peut-être que + clause is one of the most common and easiest ways to say maybe/perhaps before a full clause.

So this is very natural:

• Peut-être que le curseur bougera...

Another very natural option is to move peut-être later:

• Le curseur bougera peut-être normalement ensuite.

Starting a sentence with peut-être and then going straight into the subject without que is less straightforward for learners and can sound more formal or require a different structure. So peut-être que is the safest pattern to learn first.

Because this part talks about what may happen afterwards.

• bougera is the future form of bouger
• il bougera = it will move

That makes sense here because the speaker is predicting a possible result after restarting the computer.

This also creates a useful contrast:

• after si: plante in the present
• in the later clause: bougera in the future

That pattern is very common in French.

French adverb placement is flexible, but putting them after the verb is very natural here.

• normalement describes how the cursor will move: normally / properly
• ensuite means afterwards

So:

• bougera normalement ensuite

means something like:

• will move normally afterwards

You could also find other orders in real French, such as:

• Le curseur bougera peut-être ensuite normalement
• Le curseur bougera peut-être normalement après ça

But the original order is perfectly natural.

It follows a very common French pattern:

• Si + present, then
• a main clause in imperative / present / future / etc.

Here that gives:

• Si le logiciel plante encore demain
• essaie de redémarrer l’ordinateur
• peut-être que le curseur bougera normalement ensuite

So the sentence combines:

1. a condition: if the software crashes tomorrow
2. an instruction: try restarting the computer
3. a possible result: maybe the cursor will move normally afterwards

That structure is very typical and useful in everyday French.