Learn Hardcore French: Quand elle est stressée, Marie touche son bracelet à son poignet pour se calmer. - When she is stressed, Marie touches her bracelet on her wrist to calm herself.

Quand elle est stressée, Marie touche son bracelet à son poignet pour se calmer.

When she is stressed, Marie touches her bracelet on her wrist to calm herself.

Breakdown of Quand elle est stressée, Marie touche son bracelet à son poignet pour se calmer.

Elon.io is an online learning platform

We have an entire course teaching French grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning French now

Questions & Answers about Quand elle est stressée, Marie touche son bracelet à son poignet pour se calmer.

Why is it son bracelet and not sa bracelet, even though Marie is female?

In French, son / sa / ses agree with the noun that follows, not with the owner.

bracelet is a masculine noun: un bracelet.
So you must use the masculine possessive son: son bracelet (her bracelet / his bracelet).

If the noun were feminine, you’d use sa:

sa montre (her watch / his watch) – because montre is feminine.

So:

son bracelet = correct (masculine noun)
sa bracelet = incorrect, because bracelet is not feminine.

Why is it son poignet and not le poignet, if French often uses articles with body parts?

You’re right that with actions on one’s own body, French usually uses the definite article:

Je me lave les mains. = I wash my hands.
Il s’est cassé la jambe. = He broke his leg.

But in this sentence we’re not doing an action on the body part; we’re just specifying which wrist:

She touches the bracelet on her wrist.

Here, the possessive (son poignet) feels natural because we’re identifying which wrist (hers, not someone else’s), not describing a reflexive action on her own body part. Both of these sound fine in French:

son bracelet à son poignet – her bracelet on her wrist
le bracelet qu’elle porte au poignet – the bracelet she wears on her wrist

Using le poignet alone would sound too general here, as if it were any random wrist.

Why is the preposition à used in à son poignet instead of sur son poignet?

Both à and sur can be used with body parts, but they don’t feel quite the same:

un bracelet au poignet (very idiomatic)
un bracelet sur le poignet (possible, but less natural)

With clothing/jewelry and body parts, French often uses à / au / aux:

une bague au doigt – a ring on (one’s) finger
un chapeau sur la tête – a hat on the head (here sur works well)
des lunettes sur le nez – glasses on the nose

For bracelet + poignet, the fixed expression is really un bracelet au poignet.
In son bracelet à son poignet, à plays the same role as au (= à + le) would: it links the object (bracelet) to its location (wrist) in a very idiomatic way.

What is the difference between toucher quelque chose and toucher à quelque chose? Why is it just touche son bracelet here?

toucher + direct object means simply to touch something physically:
- Marie touche son bracelet. = Marie touches her bracelet.
toucher à + noun often means:
- to tamper with / meddle with something:
  - Ne touche pas à mes affaires. = Don’t mess with my things.
- or “to concern / affect” in more abstract senses.

In this sentence, Marie is literally putting her hand on her bracelet. That’s a direct, physical touch, so French uses toucher + COD (direct object):

Marie touche son bracelet… ✅
Marie touche à son bracelet… ❌ (would sound like “she’s messing around with her bracelet” in a more fussy way, not just touching it calmly).

Why is it Quand elle est stressée and not something like Quand elle a du stress?

French generally uses être + adjective to express emotional or physical states:

être stressé(e) – to be stressed
être fatigué(e) – to be tired
être triste – to be sad

Using avoir here would sound unnatural in standard French. You do see avoir du stress in some contexts (especially influenced by English), but it’s not the neutral, everyday way to say “to be stressed.”

So:

Quand elle est stressée = When she is stressed (normal, idiomatic)
Quand elle a du stress = sounds odd, not standard in this context.

Why does stressée have an extra -e at the end?

Because it agrees with elle / Marie, who is grammatically feminine.

Base form of the adjective: stressé (masculine singular).
To make it feminine, French usually adds -e:

Masculine: Il est stressé.
Feminine: Elle est stressée.

In writing, you see the extra -e, but in pronunciation stressé and stressée sound the same in most accents: [stʁese].

So:

Quand elle est stressée… – elle is feminine, so the adjective is marked feminine.

Why is the verb est (present tense) used after Quand? Could it be future, like in English “When she is stressed / when she gets stressed”?

In French, with quand introducing a general, habitual situation, the present tense is used in both clauses:

Quand elle est stressée, Marie touche son bracelet…
= Whenever she is stressed, Marie touches her bracelet…

English here also uses the present (“When she is stressed…”), so the pattern matches.

If you were talking about a specific future situation, French would tend to use the future tense in both parts:

Quand elle sera stressée, elle touchera son bracelet.
= When she is stressed (in the future), she will touch her bracelet.

In your sentence, we’re describing a habitual behavior, so present + present is correct and natural.

Could we say Lorsqu’elle est stressée instead of Quand elle est stressée? Is there any difference?

Yes, you can absolutely say:

Lorsqu’elle est stressée, Marie touche son bracelet…

quand and lorsque are very close in meaning (“when”). The main differences:

quand is more common and neutral in everyday speech.
lorsque can sound a bit more formal or literary, but it’s still very common.

In most casual contexts, quand is the default. In written or slightly more formal style, lorsque is also perfectly fine. Here both are correct; the meaning doesn’t really change.

Why is it pour se calmer and not just pour calmer?

The verb calmer means to calm (someone / something). Used directly, it normally needs an object:

calmer un enfant – to calm a child
calmer la tempête – to calm the storm

If Marie is calming herself, French uses the reflexive form:

se calmer – to calm down (oneself)

So:

pour calmer (by itself) = “in order to calm…” someone/something else, but we haven’t said what.
pour se calmer = “in order to calm herself,” which is what we want here.

Thus:

Marie touche son bracelet… pour se calmer.
= Marie touches her bracelet in order to calm down.

Why is se placed before calmer? I thought pronouns usually go before the conjugated verb.

You’re right that with a conjugated verb, object/reflexive pronouns go before it:

Elle se calme. – She calms down.
Elle se regarde. – She looks at herself.

But after prepositions like pour, sans, avant de, afin de, the verb is in the infinitive, and the pronoun goes before the infinitive, not before the preposition:

pour se calmer – in order to calm down
sans se plaindre – without complaining
avant de se coucher – before going to bed

So:

Conjugated: Elle se calme.
With pour
- infinitive: Elle touche son bracelet pour se calmer.

Both elle and Marie appear in the sentence. How do we know elle and se refer to Marie?

French allows a pronoun to appear before the noun it refers to, as long as the meaning is clear:

Quand elle est stressée, Marie touche son bracelet…

Here’s how we interpret the references:

In Quand elle est stressée, elle refers to the main subject that will be named right after: Marie.
In pour se calmer, the reflexive se refers back to the subject of the main clause, Marie.

So we understand:

When she (Marie) is stressed, Marie touches her bracelet in order to calm herself.

You could also write it this way to make it extra clear, though it’s slightly heavier:

Quand Marie est stressée, elle touche son bracelet à son poignet pour se calmer.

In both versions, elle and se refer to Marie.