Log inSign up

Tarkistan eräpäivän illalla, jotta en unohda palauttaa kirjaa.

Tarkistan eräpäivän illalla, jotta en unohda palauttaa kirjaa.
I check the due date in the evening so that I don’t forget to return the book.
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Finnish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Finnish now

Questions & Answers about Tarkistan eräpäivän illalla, jotta en unohda palauttaa kirjaa.

Why is tarkistan used here, and what form is it?

Tarkistan is the 1st person singular present tense of tarkistaa (to check).

  • tarkistaa → tarkistan = I check / I’m checking / I will check Finnish present tense often covers what English expresses with both present and near-future, depending on context.
Why does eräpäivä become eräpäivän with -n?

Eräpäivän is the singular total object form (often described as genitive in this context).

  • Tarkistan eräpäivän = I check the due date (a complete, definite thing)

With many transitive verbs, if the action is seen as completed/whole (not “some of it”), Finnish uses a total-object case rather than partitive.

What does eräpäivä literally mean, and how is the word built?

Eräpäivä is a compound:

  • erä
    • päivä → eräpäivä = due date (the day when something is due)

Compounds are extremely common in Finnish, and they work a lot like English compounds (e.g., birth + day).

Why is it illalla and not something like ilta or illassa?

Illalla is the adessive case of ilta (evening), used for time expressions meaning in the evening / during the evening.

  • ilta = evening (dictionary form)
  • illalla = in the evening

Many “when?” time phrases in Finnish use the adessive:

  • aamulla = in the morning
  • päivällä = during the day
  • yöllä = at night
Why is there a comma before jotta?

In Finnish, a subordinate clause is typically separated by a comma.

  • Main clause: Tarkistan eräpäivän illalla,
  • Purpose clause: jotta en unohda palauttaa kirjaa.

So the comma marks where the jotta-clause begins.

What does jotta do here, and could I use että instead?

Jotta introduces a purpose clause: so that / in order that.

  • … jotta en unohda … = … so that I don’t forget …

Että is more commonly that for content/reporting:

  • Tiedän, että hän tulee. = I know that he is coming.

In purpose meaning, jotta (or että in some contexts) can occur, but jotta is the clear, standard “purpose” connector.

How does the negation en unohda work?

Finnish negation uses a negative auxiliary verb that carries the person ending:

  • en = I do not
  • unohta- becomes unohda (the connegative form used after the negative verb)

So:

  • (minä) unohdan = I forget
  • (minä) en unohda = I do not forget

You don’t need minä because the person is already shown by en.

Why is the verb in the jotta-clause in the present (en unohda) even though it refers to the future?

Finnish commonly uses the present tense for future meaning when it’s clear from context (plans, intentions, purpose).

Here the idea is: “I check it (as a routine/plan) so that I won’t forget.” Finnish expresses that “won’t” idea naturally as:

  • jotta en unohda (literally “so that I don’t forget”)
Why is palauttaa in the basic infinitive form?

Palauttaa is the A-infinitive (dictionary infinitive), used after many verbs that describe wanting/trying/remembering/forgetting:

  • unohtaa tehdä = to forget to do
  • muistaa tehdä = to remember to do
  • yrittää tehdä = to try to do

So en unohda palauttaa … = I don’t forget to return …

Why is it kirjaa (partitive) and not kirjan?

Many learners expect kirjan, and that’s a very common choice if you mean one specific book returned completely:

  • … etten unohda palauttaa kirjan. = so that I don’t forget to return the book (as a completed return)

Kirjaa (partitive) can be used if the book is less specific/more “generic” (or in some speech styles), focusing more on the activity than the completed result. In a typical library situation with one specific book, kirjan often sounds more straightforward.

So:

  • safest for “the book (a specific one)” → kirjan
  • more open/less specific or activity-focused → kirjaa
Does Finnish word order matter here? Could illalla be moved?

Yes, you can move elements for emphasis, while keeping the same basic meaning.

Neutral:

  • Tarkistan eräpäivän illalla…

Emphasizing “in the evening (not now)”:

  • Illalla tarkistan eräpäivän…

Emphasizing the object a bit:

  • Eräpäivän tarkistan illalla… (more marked, but possible)

Word order changes what feels highlighted, not usually the core meaning.

Are there common alternative ways to say the jotta en part?

Yes. A very common alternative is to use ettei / etten (a fused form meaning so that … not / that … not, depending on context).

For this sentence you may also hear:

  • Tarkistan eräpäivän illalla, etten unohda palauttaa kirjaa/kirjan.

Both are widely used; jotta en is clear and explicit, while etten is more compact.