Para sa akin, mahalaga sa pagkakaibigan na pakinggan natin ang tanong at sagot ng lahat.

Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Filipino grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Filipino now

Questions & Answers about Para sa akin, mahalaga sa pagkakaibigan na pakinggan natin ang tanong at sagot ng lahat.

What does Para sa akin literally mean, and is it more like “for me” or “in my opinion”?

Para sa akin literally breaks down as:

  • para – for
  • sa – to/at/in (a general preposition)
  • akin – me / mine

So the literal sense is “for me” or “as for me”, but in actual usage it usually means “in my opinion” or “for me personally”.

You’ll often see it at the start of sentences when someone is giving a personal view, just like English “for me” or “personally, I think…”.

What is the role of the preposition sa in mahalaga sa pagkakaibigan?

In mahalaga sa pagkakaibigan, the preposition sa introduces the domain or context in which something is important.

  • mahalaga – important
  • sa pagkakaibigan – in/for friendship

So mahalaga sa pagkakaibigan is roughly “important in friendship” or “important for friendship.”

In Filipino, adjectives like mahalaga, madali, mahirap, etc. often use sa to show where or in what respect something is true:

  • mahalaga sa trabaho – important at work
  • mahirap sa bata – difficult for a child
Why is there a na in mahalaga sa pagkakaibigan na pakinggan natin…? What does it do?

Na in this sentence works like a linker that connects the idea “important in friendship” to the action that explains it.

  • mahalaga sa pagkakaibigan – it’s important in friendship
  • pakinggan natin ang tanong at sagot ng lahat – that we listen to everyone’s questions and answers

So mahalaga sa pagkakaibigan na… is like saying “it is important in friendship that…”

Grammatically, na is often used:

  • to link an adjective + explanation
  • to soften the connection, similar to English that or sometimes when/if depending on context
What does pakinggan mean, and how is it different from makinig?

Both relate to listening, but they’re used differently:

  • makinig (sa) – to listen (to), focusing on the act of listening
    • Makinig ka sa akin. – Listen to me.
  • pakinggan – to listen to / to hear out (a -in verb that takes a direct object)
    • Pakinggan mo ako. – Listen to me / Hear me out.

In the sentence pakinggan natin ang tanong at sagot ng lahat:

  • pakinggan treats ang tanong at sagot ng lahat as a direct object: “let’s listen to everyone’s questions and answers.”

It sounds a bit more deliberate or focused, like “really listen to” rather than just “be listening.”

What does natin mean exactly? Is it “we” or “our”?

Natin is a first-person plural inclusive pronoun in genitive (possessive/actor) form. The key bits:

  • inclusive: includes both the speaker and the listener (we/our, including you)
  • functions either as “our” or as the actor “we” in many verb constructions

In pakinggan natin ang tanong at sagot ng lahat:

  • natin is the actor of the verb pakinggan:
    “that we (you and I, all of us) listen to everyone’s questions and answers.”

Compare:

  • kami – we (excluding you)
  • tayo – we (including you)
  • namin – our / by us (excluding you)
  • natin – our / by us (including you)
Why is it ang tanong at sagot and not ang mga tanong at mga sagot if we mean more than one question and answer?

Filipino does not always require plural markers to express a general or collective idea. In this sentence:

  • ang tanong at sagot ng lahat can mean “the questions and answers of everyone” in a general sense.

You could say ang mga tanong at mga sagot ng lahat to emphasize plurality, but it’s not necessary.

Common patterns:

  • guro – can mean teacher/teachers depending on context
  • bata – child/children

Here, because lahat (everyone) already suggests many people, it’s naturally understood that there are many questions and answers.

What does ng lahat literally mean, and why is ng used instead of sa?

Breakdown:

  • lahat – all, everyone
  • ng – a marker showing possession / “of”, or marking a non-topic noun/complement

So ng lahat is literally “of all / of everyone.”

We use ng here because we’re expressing ownership or association:

  • ang tanong at sagot ng lahatthe question(s) and answer(s) of everyone

Compare:

  • sa lahat – to/for/among all
    • Ibigay mo sa lahat. – Give it to everyone.
  • ng lahat – of all
    • Mga anak ng lahat. – The children of everyone (weird example, but shows structure).
Could I say “Para sa akin, importante sa pagkakaibigan…” instead of “mahalaga sa pagkakaibigan”? Is there a difference?

Yes, you can say importante instead of mahalaga, and it will still sound natural:

  • Para sa akin, importante sa pagkakaibigan na…

Both mahalaga and importante mean “important.”

Nuance:

  • mahalaga is purely Filipino and slightly more formal/literary in tone.
  • importante is borrowed from Spanish/English and is very common and neutral in everyday speech.

In many contexts, they’re interchangeable. In a more careful or thoughtful statement about values (like friendship), mahalaga sounds especially fitting.

What does pagkakaibigan mean, and how is it different from kaibigan?
  • kaibiganfriend (a person)
  • pagkakaibiganfriendship (the relationship itself)

The prefix pagka- / pag- plus the reduplication kaka often turns a base word into an abstract noun referring to a state or relationship.

Examples:

  • magkaibigan – to be friends / friends (as a pair)
  • pagkakaibigan – the state of being friends → friendship

So mahalaga sa pagkakaibigan is literally “important in friendship,” talking about the quality of the relationship, not about an individual friend.

Why is there no word for “it is” like “it is important” in the Filipino sentence?

Filipino often omits “to be” verbs (like “is/are”) when the meaning is clear from the structure.

  • mahalaga sa pagkakaibigan already functions as “(it is) important in friendship.”
  • There is no need to say “ito ay mahalaga sa pagkakaibigan”, though that is also grammatically correct and a bit more formal or emphatic.

Common pattern:

  • Masarap ang pagkain.(It is) delicious, the food. / The food is delicious.
  • Mahalaga ito. – This (is) important.

The linking or topic-comment structure replaces the explicit “to be” verb in many cases.

Is Para sa akin, mahalaga sa pagkakaibigan… formal, informal, or neutral in tone?

It’s generally neutral to slightly formal, and very appropriate for:

  • giving opinions in conversations about values
  • writing short essays or reflections
  • polite discussion (e.g., in class, in a group)

To make it more casual, speakers might shorten or tweak it:

  • Sa’kin, importante sa pagkakaibigan na…
  • Para sa’kin, mahalaga sa friendship na… (mixing English friendship)

But the given sentence is perfectly natural in both spoken and written Filipino.

Can Para sa akin be shortened in casual speech, and is that acceptable in writing?

Yes, in everyday speech many people say:

  • Sa’kin – shortened/contracted form of sa akin
  • Para sa’kin – shortened Para sa akin

In informal writing (text messages, chats, social media), you’ll often see sa’kin, sa’yo, sa’min, etc.

However, in formal writing (essays, school papers, official documents), it’s better to use the full form:

  • Para sa akin instead of Para sa’kin
Could I say tanong at mga sagot ng lahat (with only mga sagot pluralized)? Does that sound odd?

You can say tanong at mga sagot ng lahat, and it doesn’t sound wrong, but it’s a bit unbalanced because one noun is explicitly plural and the other is not.

More natural options are:

  • ang tanong at sagot ng lahat – leave both generic
  • ang mga tanong at mga sagot ng lahat – make both clearly plural

Filipino usually keeps parallel structure when two things are joined with at (and), especially if you’re marking plurality.

Is there any tense in pakinggan natin…? How do we know if it’s about the present, past, or future?

Pakinggan here is in a command / hortative form (like “let’s listen”), so it doesn’t really mark past or future. Instead, it’s:

  • a suggestion or exhortation: “that we (should) listen”, “let us listen.”

Filipino verbs show aspect (completed, ongoing, not yet completed) more than strict tense. For this type of form:

  • pakinggan natin – let’s listen (now / generally / from now on)
  • Context tells you whether it’s about a general principle or a current/future action.

In this sentence, it’s a general principle about friendship, so the time is understood broadly rather than tied to a specific moment.