من بعد از تماس با او، آدرس رستوران را برای تو میفرستم.

من means I, but in Persian it is often optional because the verb already shows the subject.

Here, می‌فرستم means I send / I will send, so the speaker is already understood.
That means you could also say:

بعد از تماس با او، آدرس رستوران را برای تو می‌فرستم.

Adding من makes the subject more explicit. It can give a little extra emphasis, like I will send it.

بعد از means after.

In this sentence:

بعد از تماس با او
literally: after contact with him/her

A very natural English translation is:

after I contact him/her
or
after calling him/her

So بعد از is followed by a noun or noun-like expression. Here, تماس is a noun meaning contact / call.

Because the verb/noun تماس normally uses با to mean contact with someone.

So:

• تماس با او = contact with him/her
• با = with
• او = him / her

This is just the normal pattern in Persian:

• با کسی تماس گرفتن = to contact someone / to call someone
• تماس با کسی = contact with someone

So the با is required by the expression.

Often, yes, especially in everyday contexts.

تماس can mean:

• contact
• communication
• a call

In this sentence, most learners would naturally understand it as:

after I call him/her
or
after contacting him/her

If the context is everyday conversation, phone call is a very likely interpretation.

Persian often links nouns together without using a separate word like English of.

So:

• آدرس = address
• رستوران = restaurant
• آدرس رستوران = the restaurant’s address / the address of the restaurant

This relationship is usually called ezafe. In careful pronunciation, you would hear something like:

آدرسِ رستوران

That little -e / -ye sound links the two nouns, even though it is usually not written in normal Persian spelling.

را marks the specific direct object.

So in:

آدرس رستوران را برای تو می‌فرستم

the thing being sent is آدرس رستوران.
The را tells you that this is the direct object: the restaurant’s address.

A useful way to think about it:

• را often appears when the object is definite, specific, or already known in context.

So here it is not just an address, but the restaurant’s address.

برای تو means for you.

In this sentence:

آدرس رستوران را برای تو می‌فرستم
= I’ll send the restaurant’s address to you / for you

In many cases, Persian can also use به with the receiver of something:

• به تو می‌فرستم = I send it to you

Both can work, but they are not always identical in feel.

• به تو focuses more directly on the destination/recipient: to you
• برای تو can feel a little more like for you

In everyday speech, both may be heard, but برای تو می‌فرستم is completely natural.

تو is the informal singular word for you.

So this sentence is speaking to:

• one person
• in an informal/familiar way

If you wanted to be polite or formal, you would normally use شما:

... برای شما می‌فرستم.

So the choice between تو and شما tells you something about the relationship between the speakers.

او means he or she.

Persian does not usually distinguish gender in third-person singular pronouns, so او can mean either:

• him / he
• her / she

In everyday spoken Persian, people often say اون instead of او.

So:

• او = more written, formal, or neutral
• اون = very common in speech

Both mean the same thing here.

Yes, it is formally a present tense form, but Persian very often uses the present tense to talk about the future, especially when the future is clear from context.

So:

می‌فرستم
can mean:

• I send
• I am sending
• I will send

In this sentence, because of the meaning after I contact him/her, the future sense is natural:

I’ll send you the restaurant’s address after I contact him/her.

Persian also has a more explicit future construction, such as:

خواهم فرستاد = I will send

But in everyday Persian, می‌فرستم is often more natural.

Because Persian usually puts the verb at or near the end.

This sentence follows a very normal Persian order:

من — subject
بعد از تماس با او — time phrase
آدرس رستوران را — direct object
برای تو — recipient/beneficiary
می‌فرستم — verb

So Persian often feels like Subject + other information + Verb.

That final verb position is one of the big differences from English.

Yes. The original sentence is compact and natural, but Persian can also say this more explicitly, for example:

بعد از اینکه با او تماس بگیرم، آدرس رستوران را برای تو می‌فرستم.

That version is closer to:

After I contact him/her, I’ll send you the restaurant’s address.

The original version with بعد از تماس با او is shorter and very common. It uses a noun phrase instead of a full clause.

The standard modern spelling is:

می‌فرستم

with a small invisible character between می and the verb stem. This is called a zero-width non-joiner and it prevents the letters from connecting incorrectly.

You may also see:

• می فرستم — with a normal space
• میفرستم — without the standard separator

These all represent the same word, but می‌فرستم is the standard spelling.

Yes, very often.

Persian frequently drops pronouns when they are clear from the verb or context.

So this sentence could become:

بعد از تماس با او، آدرس رستوران را برایت می‌فرستم.

or

بعد از تماس با او، آدرس رستوران را می‌فرستم.

depending on what is already understood.

Also, برای تو can be shortened in speech or writing to برایت:

• برای تو می‌فرستم
• برایت می‌فرستم

Both mean I’ll send it to/for you.

A common spoken version might be:

بعد از اینکه باهاش تماس بگیرم، آدرس رستوران رو برات می‌فرستم.

Compared with the original:

• او becomes اون / باهاش
• را becomes spoken رو
• برای تو becomes برات
• the clause may become more explicit with بعد از اینکه...

But the original sentence is perfectly good Persian, especially in neutral or written style.