Breakdown of De afzuigkap is eenvoudig schoon te maken, maar de vaatwasser is vandaag niet te gebruiken.
Questions & Answers about De afzuigkap is eenvoudig schoon te maken, maar de vaatwasser is vandaag niet te gebruiken.
Why are afzuigkap and vaatwasser written as single words?
Dutch forms compound nouns very freely, much more often than English.
- afzuigkap = afzuig
- kap
- roughly: extractor hood / cooker hood / range hood
- kap
- vaatwasser = vaat
- wasser
- literally something like dish washer, so dishwasher
- wasser
In Dutch, these compounds are normally written as one word, not two.
Why is it de afzuigkap and de vaatwasser, not het?
Dutch nouns take either de or het as their definite article.
Both afzuigkap and vaatwasser are de-words, so you say:
- de afzuigkap
- de vaatwasser
Unfortunately, this is something you usually have to learn with each noun. There are patterns, but for everyday vocabulary it is best to memorize the noun together with its article.
What does eenvoudig mean here? Does it literally mean simple or easy?
It literally often means simple, but in this sentence it is best understood as easy:
- eenvoudig schoon te maken = easy to clean
Dutch eenvoudig can overlap with English simple and easy, depending on context. Here it describes how much effort cleaning takes, so easy is the most natural translation.
Why does Dutch say schoon te maken instead of just schoonmaken?
This is a very common Dutch pattern:
- zijn + adjective/adverb + te + infinitive
So:
- is eenvoudig schoon te maken
literally means something like:
- is easy to make clean
- more naturally: is easy to clean
This structure is often used where English uses to + verb after an adjective:
- Het boek is moeilijk te lezen = The book is difficult to read
- De deur is makkelijk te openen = The door is easy to open
Is schoon te maken related to the verb schoonmaken?
Yes. The base verb is schoonmaken, which means to clean.
Because schoonmaken is a separable verb, te goes between the two parts:
- infinitive: schoonmaken
- with te: schoon te maken
That is completely normal for separable verbs in Dutch:
- opbellen → op te bellen
- aandoen → aan te doen
- schoonmaken → schoon te maken
Why is it niet te gebruiken?
This is the same te + infinitive structure as in the first clause.
- is niet te gebruiken = cannot be used / is not usable
It does not necessarily mean no one in the world can ever use it. In context, it usually means:
- it is unavailable
- it is out of order
- it should not be used
- it is unusable at the moment
So in this sentence, de vaatwasser is vandaag niet te gebruiken most naturally means that the dishwasher cannot be used today.
Why is niet placed before te gebruiken?
Because niet negates the predicate phrase te gebruiken.
So:
- is vandaag niet te gebruiken
means:
- is not usable today
- cannot be used today
In Dutch, niet often comes before the part it negates. Here it negates the whole te gebruiken idea.
Why is vandaag in the middle of the clause?
Dutch main clauses typically place the finite verb in second position, and adverbs like vandaag often come after that verb.
So the structure is:
- de vaatwasser = subject
- is = finite verb
- vandaag = time adverb
- niet te gebruiken = rest of the predicate
That gives:
- De vaatwasser is vandaag niet te gebruiken.
This is very natural Dutch word order.
Could the sentence also say gemakkelijk instead of eenvoudig?
Yes. gemakkelijk would also work well.
- De afzuigkap is gemakkelijk schoon te maken.
Both eenvoudig and gemakkelijk can mean easy here.
A small nuance:
- eenvoudig can sound a bit more like simple / straightforward
- gemakkelijk more directly means easy
In this sentence, both are natural.
Why is there a comma before maar?
Because maar joins two main clauses:
- De afzuigkap is eenvoudig schoon te maken
- de vaatwasser is vandaag niet te gebruiken
This is similar to English:
- The extractor hood is easy to clean, but the dishwasher cannot be used today.
The comma helps mark the contrast between the two clauses.
Could niet te gebruiken mean the same as kapot?
Sometimes in practice, yes, but not exactly.
- kapot = broken
- niet te gebruiken = not usable / cannot be used
If a dishwasher is broken, then it is niet te gebruiken.
But something can also be niet te gebruiken for other reasons:
- it is being cleaned
- it is disconnected
- it is reserved
- it is temporarily unavailable
So niet te gebruiken is broader than kapot.
Is schoon here an adjective or part of the verb?
Historically and grammatically, it is part of the separable verb schoonmaken.
- schoon by itself means clean
- schoonmaken means to clean
In the phrase schoon te maken, schoon is not just an ordinary separate adjective in the English sense; it belongs to the verb construction. That is why learners should think of schoonmaken as one vocabulary item, even though it can split in some sentence patterns.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning DutchMaster Dutch — from De afzuigkap is eenvoudig schoon te maken, maar de vaatwasser is vandaag niet te gebruiken to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions